I’m glad y’all are living how you want. Are you a “Chad” or what? (Handsome, tall, talented, influential, wealthy)
Not that I’ve seen. Except for the trickery of it. I.e. the woman delegates what / how she wants something done, he does it the way she wants, then she tells him, “gee, you’re such a good leader!” 
She’s actually the one setting the agenda and evaluating how he did for next time. He’s the General but she’s President.
My family / friends / extended family are full of women either leading (from the Drivers seat or Passenger seat) or in egalitarian relationships.
Some used to be in more “traditional” relationships/marriages, but those guys got left sooner or later.
For many it was foolish to depend on men for provision or protection / stability. It’s foolish for anyone to 100% depend on someone else for those things.
Women don’t want a man who is weak to anyone. Nobody likes a loser or spinless person. But they most often do want a man who will bend for her.
Feminism is not about rejecting being feminine. It is about defending the rights of women.
Preventing women from working certain jobs, holding office, voting, owning property, etc. isn’t “biological reality”. It’s just oppression.
You are living in a dream world and so in denial of how things actually work.
Women had no power to give themselves rights. They couldn’t vote or hold office. Men are the ones who ultimately voted for their rights. So, men gave women their rights. If you can’t do the simple if A=B and B=C, then A=C problem in your head, then you are stupid and not even worth talking to.
Demonstrations by people who hold no power do nothing. Ask the demonstrators in other countries. What do you think happens to Iranian women who demonstrate against the IRGC. How does that work out for them?
Women have to appeal to the patriarchy because the patriarchy is the one who protects their freedoms. Like I said, if the majority of men came to the conclusion in this country that women no longer have those rights and go back to how it was, there isn’t a damn thing women can do about it. Period. The examples of this is all over the world and they can’t do jack about it.
No one said might makes right. You did. Right or wrong, might makes the final decision. The primary enforcers of law are men. If men stopped enforcing them, they wouldn’t be able to be enforced.
You didn’t comprehend or ignored what i wrote already, so we’re at an impass here. And you are absolutely implying might makes right when it comes to men & women.
Insert the words “poor people” or “Blacks” in place of “women” in what you wrote and see how it looks.
No I didn’t. Because something is the truth, doesn’t mean it is right or even that I would agree with it. It just means it is true. You somehow can’t make that distinction because that distinction collapses the idea of feminism.
You can insert whatever you want. Truth is truth. No matter how much you or everyone else likes or dislikes it.
If men wanted to take away womens rights tomorrow and locked in cages. That is what would happen. The end. I’m not saying it is right or that is what should happen. Just that it would. You can’t deny that either, which is why, in the end, appealing to the patriarchy is inevitably what women must always do. Like it or not…and feminism’s concept of not needing men is bs.
You’re saying men are more powerful beings than women, 10-4. Agreeing to disagree.
Then you are in idiot in denial. There are so many examples in the world of women with no rights and they can’t do jack about it. If they were as powerful, this wouldn’t be so. Give me an example of women “fighting” there way to freedom. You can’t, because it never happened and it never will.
So, nobody gets thier rights protected unless they can physically beat thier oppressors? Trial By Combat? 
Seriously? Are you that far from reality? That is the way it works and always will work. What protects peoples rights? Enforcement. Without it, there is no consequence and rights and laws get violated. It’s called anarchy.
I actually have come to the conclusion that you are actually not a male (a traditional one anyway). Not getting basic concepts of how things actually work is anti logical and can only happen in the emotional realm.
1 Like
Rights are inherent. However, if you do not have a group of people who are strong enough to forcibly defend a right from being violated by others, you effectively don’t have that right. Women can’t do anything significant to defend their rights. Men literally spill the blood to allow women to exercise their rights.
When they demonstrated, they were appealing to men.
They literally didn’t have the physical strength to do it themselves and still don’t to this day. It’s not about it being right or wrong. It’s just reality.
Women can help, but not in any significant way. If 50% of the men in the United States decided that women could no longer exercise a given right, there would be absolutely nothing that they could do about it.
I’d say that I’m average looking and do better financially than most. One of the keys to being able to build wealth is to find a woman who isn’t materialistic and agrees with being financially conservative.
Don’t listen to what they say they want. Look at what they respond to. Most women do not respect men who give in to their whining and nagging. It turns them off. The most arousing word a man can say to most women is no. Sure, they may not like it in the moment, but they’ll respect a man for saying it to them. Remember, a woman will not love a man that she doesn’t respect. The men who are most desired by women say no to them all the time. The men who are least desired by women try to make up for their deficiencies by saying yes to everything women want. It simply doesn’t work.
If that’s the case, then why do feminist women have such distain for women who choose to stay home with their children and be homemakers? They view them as traitors instead of having respect for their choice.
Women in the United States can literally work any job their qualified for, hold any public office they can get elected to, vote in elections if they’re citizens, own whatever property a man can, etc. In other words, there is zero oppression of women.
To think that women have the same physical power as men you have to be willfully deluding yourself.
The Cornell Seven were just exonerated by some crazy e-mails the Girl in question had posted.
Wow. She should be charged with something if she just made up sh*t. There has to be an example of why this is not ok to do.
1 Like
When you stick your “D” in Crazy you never know how things will end up.
Some of those Guys were thrown out of School and Doxed by the State Government. So there should be a Hell of a Pay Day coming for each of them.
Also Both Letticia James and Gov. Houchol went all in with this absolutly calling these Young Men everything but a Child oif God.
Those two can be burnt at the Stake, I can’t believe James still has a Law Licence.
Sometimes things are so good for people for so long that people lose appreciation for how fragile their freedoms are, who protects their rights and who wants to take them away. Case in point, feminists now vote for politicians who allow men into our country who force women in their home countries to cover themselves from head to toe. What do these feminists think will happen if these kind of men get in power?
TMZ Released everything.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z8wING3LqEI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0MDGKs6lc08
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zjDLjZPJKIw&t=1050s
Women are powerless you say? Remind the women in your family and other women often, don’t let them forget.
Feminist are not monolithic.
When i talk about now, you bring up the past. When i bring up the past, you refer to the present. I was talking about the past.
There is more to power than physical strength. C’mon, now…
Implicit in your suggestion is a fear of what they might say. I don’t fear and I don’t need to remind the women in my family that women can’t do anything significant to defend their rights. They understand this just as they understand that senior citizens are in the same boat. What they don’t understand is why people willfully blind themselves to such simple truths. It doesn’t speak to our value as human beings. It’s just reality. As for other women, I’m willing to have a civil conversation with anyone who is willing to listen to and consider what I have to say, just as I will do for them. However, I will not waste my time speaking with people who won’t provide me the same respect because they’re not interested in having their beliefs challenged.
I bring up what’s relevant based on the context.
Sure. There’s also the willingness to use it. This is how less than 10% of the population in Iran is able to control the entire country.
For those of you with the fantasy of denying women thier rights by force be sure to start at home with your mom’s, wives, daughters, etc.
Everyone will be happier and better off, right?
That’s probably because you categorize people into narrow groups. I.e. A man is either Conservative or a liberal queer. A woman is either good & subservient or a green-haired feminist.
Everyone who has taken the time to read this thread knows that nobody said anything of the sort. When you have to resort to such strawman arguments, it’s a pretty good clue that the facts don’t back up your contentions.
You implied the threat right here. I didn’t make it up.