But. several hundred rounds after the “break in” I was still getting FTF’s…
I said screw it, you only live once…
Yeah, a kimber break-in is painful… and feels like pissing money away.
That’s a bad ass Wilson though. CQB?
Go bucks! Hopefully they can find some offensive rythm this Sat.
my girl picks them up at every gun show we go to and looks at me with the brown eyes saying but its so pretty and fits my hand, but it seems that every time I come across something on them it is not positive
Tolerances are too tight. I don’t know why people (I don’t mean YOU guys) claim the guns are crap when the problem is the things are made so damned tight they aren’t worth a shit for several hundred rounds. That doesn’t make it a shit gun, they’re just stupidly tight.
I’ve had a 1st gen CDP that has NEVER had a single issue and I am only on my second spring. I’m just not seeing all the issues others have. Maybe mine was “sloppy,” but I doubt it as it was a custom shop.
I’m not a Kimber owner but I’ve had several friends that were. That’s a string of horror stories for another thread. What I wanted to mention was a I had a Springfield Armory customized several years ago and it was accurized to the point it was so tight I could barely get the slide off.
Now, thousands of rounds and a number of years later, the slide removes with ease. So I guess the point I’m driving at is if my Springfield could be that tight and still perform 100% (With 230 round nose) then there’s no reason I can imagine why a factory tightened Kimber would not run just as well. So while I won’t say Kimbers are “shit” guns. There’s something not being put together right.
All that said my boss has one that he bought last year that runs like a house afire.
I’ve had two Kimbers for years with thousands of rounds through each, no problems with either.
I have had four and each one has had to go back to Kimber at least once. I finally started sending them to Springfield to get fixed. Though not reliable, they have all been very accurate.
Tightness has nothing to do with it. My two 1911s, a Springfield Custom Carry and a Les Baer Concept II, are tighter than any Kimber I’ve ever handled and they run and run.
As for the tolerances…it was not as tight as my TRP…which is not quite as tight as the CQB (Close though).
I shot the TRP back to back and it fed everything…hollow point…alluminum Blazer…
I have a Kimber Ultra for CCW that has close to 2,500 through it and runs perfectly. It struggled with certain hollow points for the first 300-400 but now eats anything.
Nice Wilson though, can’t argue with that choice.
To solve reliability problems with a Kimber, try replacing the MIM extractor and firing pin stop with a machined extractor and tighter-fitting (possibly slightly oversize or fitted) firing pin stop. The MIM extractor doesn’t seem to work as well as a machined part. A tight firing pin stop will prevent any rotation of the extractor, which could impede its function.
I have had a Generation I Kimber for years now, with several thousand rounds through it. Making these changes resulted in going from well over 99% reliability to 100% reliability.
Kimber does not have a custom shop. Their guns are all made in the same way, with the same parts. The only thing their “custom shop” is, is an extra step in the manufacturing process where they stamp “custom shop” on the slide. It is a marketing ploy by Kimber and nothing more.
I have owned two Kimbers, both “pro” models (commander size for the most part) and neither of them worked right after many hundreds of rounds. I sold them both for a loss and will never own another unless it has been gone through by a well known smith. One of my partners at work has a Kimber Worrior and he had to send it back recently because of numerous feeding problems. While their guns may look good, my overall experience has not been that positive. For what they cost, there are FAR better choices in a 1911 than a Kimber. This is of course, just my personal opinion.
I’d love to own a Wilson, but the wife said SHE’D sell one of my kidneys if I bought one right now.
I’ve had a few Kimbers over the years. The best of them still rides on my right hip daily. I replaced the main spring with a Wolff years back and it made a vast improvement in reliability, so I went ahead and replaced all the springs, including the sear spring from Wilson. I haven’t had much in the way of failures since… with the exception of this day…
It started to hick up a bit on day two of a Magpul class. That Pueblo stuff is like baby powder.
I really do want a Wilson though, nice pistol!
Heard too many horror stories to drop the hammer on a kimber, but the older models I have shot were not bad.
That being said, they all went back to the factory for somthing.
That speaks volumes to me.
Like the Wilson, though. Nice.
Uhm, no. Kimber 1911’s suck.
C4
I’ve had a bunch of 1911s by different companies over the years including 4 Kimbers (series I). They were all great pistols, but the problems they’ve had with Series II have really turned me off. I love the only Kimber I’ve got left, a 3" SIS model, but would hesitate to buy any other new Kimbers. WB
My Kimber runs fine. The first 400 rounds I had four FTE and dont even try hollow points in it anymore for the many FTF. I also have a Springfield…that I would choose first if I had to pick. It has been 100% with FMJ and JHP. My first 1911 was my Kimber (drank the Kool-Aid), hence my screen name.
Had a VERY early made Kimber, no one, even the gunshop I bought it from at the time, had even heard of them yet.
I shot that gun for 10 years, it was an almost total POS. Dont know why I kept it that long, cant remember, but the first time i got a decent offer to sell…out the door it went. Ive since shot 2-3 more and I just would not own another one. MOST over rated 1911 on the market, imo. Wilson is second.
Why do you say Wilson is overrated? Every one I have shot was a great pistol, hands above most 1911’s I have ever shot… and that’s quite a few. What is your bad experience?