Want a PCC, PTR 9C vs B&T GHM-9

I have an MPX, Zenith MP5 and B&T APC Pro 9mm. Can’t go wrong with any of them really. All have run great after a break-in period for the MPX.

You’re headed down the right path, good luck.

PB

anecdotally,

I dont think that most of the B&T sub gun line up are there yet reliability wise. I have wanted to pick up a ghm9 since they came out and it seems like there are always a number of threads showing issues with mags, or feeding. I really like idea of being able to run glock mags but even with the glock lowers, seems that the guns are still hit and miss.

While I am not really a fan of the 1970’s ergos of the Mp5, the is no debating that its a functioning platform

Delete

Inbox full. Shipped.

OP, I’d probably do the B&T. Everything B&T that I’ve touched has been excellent, and its a more modern design. I don’t have a huge sampling of PTRs, but the G3s we got had some issues that gave me pause about spending my own money there.

edit: Should I remove the thread protector from the barrel before shooting with a suppressor attached via the tri lug? I’m thinking yes but perhaps it it unnecessary.

I’ve never removed the thread protector when using a tri lug suppressor on mine.

If you can’t find or afford a real HK SP5, get the B&T. I have a APC Pro 9 and have had zero issues with the magazines thus far.

I had a Zenith and played with a PTR. They are not cheap to begin with, and you’re better off getting the real deal (no canted sights, legit HK parts).

Too late :smiley:

I’m still on the lookout for an SP5 because I would like the real deal but I’m not willing to pay 50% over msrp for one. If I don’t get a real HK at least I have the Zenith. After shooting this weekend I’m glad I went with the mp5 (clone) - I’m sure the B&T is awesome and probably better is some ways but I think if I’d gone that route I’d still want an mp5 whereas the opposite is not true.

You should not remove the thread protector to use a 3-lug can.