respectfully, although I dont particularly like the law, I foresee no Constitutional issues with it…
The Eighth Amendment is not applicable in this particular instance because it is not a criminal fine imposed…this is very specifically a civil penalty imposed for violation of the terms and conditions of a state issued license…The Eighth Amendment is pretty much applicable for bail (obviously) and for sentences for crimes…this law does not impose further sentences for crimes…it imposes civil penalties…In fact, I was in Circuit Court on Monday and, while waiting, listened to the Clerk explain over the phone how the Courts will not even be in charge of enforcing these new fines, the DMV will (which makes total sense, as the issuing authority of the license, see below)
Put simply, restaurant owners can have fines imposed on their restaurant license if they fail to maintain certain health code standards…the state issues the licenses, and has civil means for enforcing the terms of that license…
This, really, is no different…and is quite separate from the criminal fines imposed…to take the above example one step further…if the Virginia State legislature were to pass laws that made it criminal for restauranteers to violate health codes, they could face criminal fines and sanctions for breaking that law, in addition to any civil penalties for breaking the terms of their license…
Put in yet another way, you have essentially entered into a contract with the State for your driver’s license, and these new fines represent a penalty they are imposing for breaches you have made of an implied promise of that contract (ie., that in return for their issuing you a motor vehicle license, you will not abuse that privilege, and will operate your vehicle in a safe manner)…
As far as the equal protection issues (14th Amendment) and the Privileges and Immunities issues, they also do not apply here…a state is ABSOLUTELTY within its right to make laws that only apply to its citizenry, and do not apply to citizens of other states…
Equal protection issues (and P&I issues) arise when a state discriminates against residents of another state in order to grant an advantage for its own residents…
For example, if Virginia were to apply a road tax on truckers not based in Virginia, while not forcing in state truckers to pay that tax…that would cause issues…
But that is not what is going on here…
Furthermore a state cannot deny Privileges and Immunities to residents of another state…again, not going on here…
States create laws that apply only to their citizenry all the time…so long as those laws do not create a discriminatory effect against out of state residents, they are most likely fine…
This law, as far as I can see, does none of that…
Of course, there are many Constitutional scholars out there much smarter than I am, but I am betting a lot of them work for both the General Assembly and the State’s Attorney General, both who likely had a hand in making sure this law didn’t run afoul of the US Constitution…
it doesnt mean it doesnt suck though 