https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BSLq0QbyALY
Good Stuff here, you need to Listen.
https://grokipedia.com/page/2026-united-states-supreme-court-gun-law-decisions
Sorry, you’re going to have to read this convoluted mess.
In Wolford v. Lopez, petitioners challenged a Hawaii statute that prohibits concealed-carry permit holders from carrying firearms onto private property open to the public—such as businesses and restaurants—without the property owner’s express permission, despite the state’s recognition of a right to public carry following the Supreme Court’s decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen.[6][24] The case arose after Hawaii adjusted its permitting regime post-Bruen to issue concealed-carry licenses more broadly, but maintained the restriction on private commercial premises, leading to arrests and permit denials for individuals seeking to carry in such locations for self-defense.[5]Petitioners argued that the law lacks historical analogues, asserting that Founding-era traditions did not impose blanket prohibitions on armed entry to private commercial properties beyond sensitive government or educational sites, emphasizing the Second Amendment’s protection for bearing arms in places of potential confrontation like markets and shops.[2][24] They contended that while property owners could historically exclude individuals at discretion, states did not enact categorical bans requiring advance permission for law-abiding carriers, viewing the modern rule as an undue burden on the right to self-defense outside the home.[6]Gun rights organizations, including the National Rifle Association and Firearms Policy Coalition, filed amicus briefs supporting the petitioners, highlighting the need for armed self-defense in commercial settings where crimes like robbery occur frequently and arguing that the restriction effectively nullifies public carry rights in everyday private spaces.[2]
The National Rifle Association viewed the rulings as significant affirmations of Second Amendment protections against certain federal restrictions, consistent with their support for challenges to firearm prohibitions in ongoing litigation