Hey guys,
What is the thinking behind the 13 inch barreled Scar H? What is its proper role?
Hey guys,
What is the thinking behind the 13 inch barreled Scar H? What is its proper role?
The Mk17 CQC is intended for exactly that; Close Quarters Combat. I bet it is loud as hell in the house, but puts muhj in the dirt with authority.
Stephen
Kill booger eating tangos & defeat intermediate barriers denying concealment & some types of alleged cover until the threat is resolved.
I am a big 5.56 fan. BUT - if i were going into a CQB situation and I could carry a 13" 7.62 with some kind of expanding or fragmenting ammo, I would be a very happy camper indeed. 155gr TAP or a Barnes X bullet? Yes, please. I’m sure this setup will bang bad guys’ dicks in the dirt with noticeably more authority than any 5.56.
I once fired an HK51 inside a gun range (full auto). Amazingly, I was still able to father a child about a year after.
It’s not nearly as bad as a HK 51. Those things are just beasts.
The Mk.17 Mod.0 CQC is very controllable and fairly soft shooting considering the caliber, weight, and barrel length.
hk51 barrel length ivo 9" if i remember right, and roller locked has a crap recoil impulse
roller locked decent for extreme environmental situations
I have a hk33 clone in 7.62, 16", which was good for the times… 10+ yrs ago. presently I would take a mk17. nice weight for the caliber, long recoil cycle, better ergonomics, etc. The mk16/17 are bulkier due to manufacturing method, but if it works… it works
None of what I have said should be taken as a criticism of the SCAR. I was really asking.
I will probably pick up a civy Scar H at some point.
It looks like this gun fills the same role as the old G3K, which had a similar size and weight.