I may not agree with him on all issues, still the best Gov in the US I suspect. No doubt at all he’d make one of the best POTUS we ever had. If he and Ron Paul ran together, they’d make a great team. Now if he could do something about the cost of home insurance, that would be huge!
My Home State of Texas keeps talking about no property tax for everyone over 65.
Sounds good, just doesn’t seem to happen.
Ron Paul? aka Dr No… 23-year congressional do-nothing and three-time presidential primary loser. His son, Rand, is a chip off the Dr No block. I like Ron DeSantis. He does well with strong republican majorities in the Florida legislature. I don’t believe he’s got what it takes to win a fight in Washington against today’s unhinged anti-America democrats. His primary run against Trump was a predictable curb stomping.
Yep, legislation aimed at limiting the size and scope of .gov is rarely popular with democrat and republican elected officials and probably even less popular with their voters.
Yeah I’m gonna say no to a 93 year old VP candidate who was one of Iran’s biggest supporters in Congress.
I said “run together” with Paul in VP slot. He does not have the gravitas to be POTUS.
With their non-interventionist high morals, both Ron and his son would surely wait for nuclear detonations in America before considering military action against Iran. Hell, the boy has been voting with low-IQ Hakeem Jeffries to stop Trump’s military action against Iran.. sigh…
I heard you the first time.
Well sure… not being up to the job of POTUS is the perfect qualifier for a VP pick 
The biggest problem with the Pauls and similar is their wanting to get .gov out of the anti 2A and other anti rights businesses.
Can’t find where Ron Paul has ever supported Iran at all.
Bet you would adore him if he had though.
For some, not supporting US manipulation of others nations internal workings, often by assassination, bribery, $, etc is equivalent to supporting that country. Paul, both of them really, being Libertarians are non interventionist purists. We could debate the pros/cons of US interventions and their outcomes over time, but that’s where they stand. That’s also where discussion of “Big L” Libertarian and small come in. I consider myself a small L Libertarian.
A number of years ago I was a big fan of the Paul’s and then I came to the realization that we cannot rule in purity because we live in an impure World. The Paul’s seem to be willing to work very hard to keep their integrity, but in the meantime, that’s pretty much all they accomplish managing a spit shined level of integrity.
By refusing to compromise their integrity have compromised the representation of eveyone in their Districts.
Those who are interventionists in foreign affairs are also opposed to limiting government domestically and opposed to the notion of citizens having rights.
Compromising away the rights and freedoms of US citizens is always a price worth paying.
Never said that, but if you look at it our system is built on cooperation in order to work, if you dont want to cooperate nothing gets done.
Can’t even get through the first 60 seconds before Ron Paul says he believes the Iranians are honest. Believes Iran when they say their goal is not to have a nuclear weapon. Then in the same breath defends Iran acquiring a nuclear weapon because they’d be derelict not to. After 40 seconds that’s all could stomach. Ron Paul = Death to America Iran’s BFF.
Below is the full dose for anyone interested.
But he still has his warped sense of Integrity.
What’s the lack of cooperation? Anything the 2 sides of the same coin want done gets done.
Paul also pointed out the similarity to not being allowed to have a gun which is a notion that appeals to democrat and republican sides of the same coin.