Rochelle Anti-2nd and Taran Tac


Rochelle, 28

From: California and Hawaii
Occupation: Flight attendant

Why do you have a gun?
I was originally given a gun as a gift. I went out shooting once, and I happened to be naturally good at it. I was 20 at the time. I’ve done sporadic competitive shooting. I have a lot more fun with it—I’m in it more for fun than competing.

What do you say to people who question the value of a private citizen owning a gun?
I think that if there were less guns, there would be less shootings, period. If the government came in and decided to take the guns away, I wouldn’t be mad about it. I think it’s important to be able to feel safe in your home, but you don’t need more than three guns. You don’t need to own a semiautomatic weapon or a silencer.

When mass shootings or school shootings happen—like the one this week—does it ever make you rethink your position?
Going to the Second Amendment, I don’t think they had AK-47s and everything else in mind [when they imagined] the right to bear arms and protecting yourself. At SHOT show, you can kind of see how much it’s evolved into thousands and thousands of people dumping millions and millions of dollars into the industry…. I guess I’d say it’s almost unfortunate people think that they need so much.

Taran Tac has dropped her.

Excited to see this conversation.

Glad they dropped her like a ton of hot potatoes faster than two tweakers scratchin.

Is it really that surprising with her home states listed? All I can think is the excitement that must have been in that Glamour reporter’s head after getting that interview and statements. Controversy is dollas.

Why does anyone care?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

hope at all events every single person should turn their back on her

but again like I say just because someone is something like owns a gun does not make them OK anymore

like that teacher thread they have done their job for the most part seems the majority under 30 are anti US anti gun do not know history and think whites are bad everyone who is white is racist and bad and so many other idiocies

and those under 25 the numbers are even higher

I dunno if anyone does.

I just thought it would make for a good General Discussion on a topic that hits close to the industry that, the majority here, sponsor and advocate for in their day to day lives.

Fair enough, nonetheless.

Sadly, I don’t doubt that you are very accurate in these statements.

Oh look, one of Taran Butler’s gun bunnies said something stupid. It was just a matter of time before that happened.

It’s astonishing that someone in the “industry” could be so ignorant regarding the 2nd Amendment. Everyone is entitled to their opinion and I respect hers [read not agree], but clearly you are not entitled to a job. Darwin award given for voicing “anti-gun” opinion while working at a gun company…giving an anti-gun interview at the largest pro-gun gathering in the world.

I don’t know why, but for some stupid reason it amazes me that there are citizens of this country who still don’t understand the purpose of the second amendment. Of course the founding fathers had no idea that we would one day have AK-47’s, but even if they did know it still wouldn’t have changed the purpose or wording of the second amendment.

You mean her current employment has anything to do with something other than her looks? Hired eye candy is just that.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sad but true. I can think of several chicks who can shoot, are hotter, hells of a lot smarter, who could fill the roll. One though might try to take the company over since her goal, last I knew was working for the NRA.

Hope it was worth it.

I get burned out on guns and “gun people” too and I imagine being eye candy on top of that breeds some airheadedness but I am not OK with The Man taking my stuff and if Gen. Washington had access to beltfeds and ARs; he couldn’t get enough. So the whole “duh they only had muskets” bit is super naive.

Puckle Guns were a thing and the Framers would consider anything worthwhile as a weapon.

Meh, she’ll turn up on Brazzers. And not the “premium” Brazzers

Seems like gun people put foot in mouth often. Wonder what gives?

She isn’t even that good looking.

I think TT handled it very well, terminating her. The super tryhard youtube social media gun guys are trying to call them out like Taran can control what his employees say, and that he’s soft on them and all this other BS.

Sex sells, and some of his employees can actually do pretty well at the range. I just don’t care for the “I’m more patriot than you kill her and F Taran tactical!” internet hardasses out there. Oh well.

From the picture in the OP I would be hard pressed to call that eye candy, doesn’t seem to have much for brains either

Funny thing is, I bet she doesn’t understand the backlash and why all the controversy.

Before long someone well have her on their show to talk about how she was victimized by the evil gun community. She’ll be used as a poster child for the anti crowd, “See folks even this pro shooter is for common sense gun control”.

I care because the anti-gun media searches out these airheads to use to attack MY rights. If you don’t care, that’s on you. :frowning:

She is more ‘eye kale’. Doesn’t look that good and is tough to get to go down.

Chicks at the range get an instant 2 point bump. I don’t know what it is. I think being at the range lets them embrace their animal side a bit more, and we can pick up on that. She was at SHOT, so she didn’t get the bump.

She’s a ‘flight attendant’ which is what they have to call them since ‘stewardess’ has too many, to me, positive connotations. ‘Air Troll’ is too descriptive. Millenial Flight attendants are the worst. Really DGAF about people as they jet from city to city. The older ones are just pissed off, I swear I had one recently that was so old she joined the 100 foot club with Wilbur AND Orville. But I digress.

The chicks in Taran’s video’s are hot, but that is when he is hanging with Keanu.

Stupid chicks say stupid things.

Ask her if the founding fathers had twitter in mind for freedom of speech.

https://www.glamour.com/gallery/we-asked-real-women-at-the-worlds-biggest-gun-show-why-do-you-own-a-gun

One out of all of them. I’m sure that they felt that they had to include one person with a contrarian view.

I went to the Glamour link. Lots of articulate comments that reflect well on those interviewed. It started out as a hit piece but the interviews were positive.

Ditto on the kale analogy.

Eye kale. That is amazing, going to have to use that one sometime.

Brings up tech from colonial times, doesnt realize that repeating firearms existed.

You want to play that game, give me my cannon.

“Eye kale” is the best thing ive read all week.

I’m glad to see the rest of the women interviewed have their shit squared away. Hell, even that convention employee gets it.