You recall that cluster F? It appears the idiot with the AR was on their side, who was shot by “security” supporting protestors, who was charged for hitting an innocent protestor. The entire thing was fail on top of fail. He seems to give a good breakdown of the event. They didn’t charge him with shooting the guy with the AR which seems to me admitting he had the legal Right to engage the guy with the AR, which I assume the defense will point out and use:
