Decided I don’t care. Will stick with DI until I die.
The last guns I will own will be DI Colt AR’s and Colt 1911’s.
7n6
Decided I don’t care. Will stick with DI until I die.
The last guns I will own will be DI Colt AR’s and Colt 1911’s.
7n6
Why the epiphany? Did you witness a catastrophic piston gun failure or something?
Me, I appreciate not having to clean the gas system on an AR. It was really that simple. I got tired of cleaning carbon out of AK and SKS gas tubes, and when I learned you don’t need to clean the inside of that long skinny AR gas tube my ears perked up and I began to be interested in the system.
Correct gassing and quality parts are everything. I wouldn’t take a piston gun for free.
I’d take a 416 for free. Then turn around and sell it for an awesome profit. ![]()
Double
Glad you cleared that up.
[emoji57]
Why is this topic like f’ing Groundhog Day around here?
I can’t keep track of the DI v piston threads here lately.
What about ARs that use this piston?



An object, that moves in a linear motion, within a cylinder, is called a … piston.
I’d just spend it on an ACC…![]()
Yeah, them DI guys love beating a dead horse
But they shit where they eat!!111!!
seriously, now you have me curious about what your original question was.
Keep drinking that Stoner koolaid.
I’m all for open discussion between piston and DI, but, why?
I thought we were above the Trollolol factor on M4C in our “Technical Forum”.
Just saying…
I believe it was a question about if the LMT piston system was as reliable was the H&K piston system, since the latter is commonly cited as being the only op rod piston driven AR that “got it right”.
Also, how did I know MistWolf was going to do the stupid piston pedant thing?
Anymore, it is just downright amusing to read these endless arguments about DI v. Piston, etc.
Let’s keep mindless posts off of here.