Lifted from my LGS email.
What about SBR’s and SBS’s?
An important note, all Short Barrel Rifles (SBR) and Short Barrel Shotguns (SBS) are still subject to Form 4 registration because under the Gun Control Act, SBR’s and SBS’s still need state Attorney General approval, and the only way currently to get that approval is through the Form 4 process with fingerprinting, wait time for approval, and all that.
Business as usual.
This has been very over hyped.
Have you contacted anyone? I reached out to my Congressman, Senator, POTUS, and VPOTUS about not appealing the ruling. Will be emailing the state reps, AG, and governor today. I have low hopes but it will not hurt.
Why do we give this douchbag yout00be views? 
I don’t what makes him a douchebag or why it is a problem that he is going over the details that indicate this appears to be ultimately meaningless.
New Palmetto vid on SBR/SBS.
So… I’ve got a couple PSA AR lowers but that is not specially addressed. Only complete rifles and pistols purchased at PSA. Did I miss mention of lowers or???
Specific qualifying firearms as stated in the vid.
His douchebag personality. Dude’s a fucking goofball. I was unlucky enough to see some of his retardation on Instagram. Specifically a post about that lunatic who ran onto the airstrip and ruined a jet engine. Numbnuts said airstrips “should be avoided”. Really, you bald headed ass wipe? I was planning an airstrip picnic.
Dude’s too in love with the smell of his own farts.
Are you sure that wasn’t “avoid airstrips accordingly”?
I don’t recall who started it, but it’s just a variation on “plan accordingly”.
"Washington DC metro police responded to a suspected bomb/IED this morning and cordoned off several blocks before an EOD team was sent in to investigate.
After a meticulous inspection, the device was confirmed to not only be inert but in fact it was a sex toy.
Inspect roadside trash accordingly…"
"Yet another dirty cop caught abusing unconstitutional Flock cameras / AI software for personal reasons.
Also, make up should be illegal - both of those images are the same woman 
Now former detective Brandy Almany (40), reportedly used Flock cameras/software to track her husband’s ex-wife at least 47 times from April through July alone.
Charge your sawzall batteries accordingly…
"
"Police responded to a “teen takeover” in Flint Michigan earlier this week.
As police arrived, a fight involving multiple parties reportedly broke out and many of the “teens” scattered.
A 19 year old, who hasn’t been named, then opened fire (see video below) and killed Mason Pritt (16) and Dwayne Thompson Jr. (17).
Avoid Flint, Michigan accordingly…"
Flock shit isn’t for Dontavious and Sha-Nay-Nay. They’ll get the usual slap on the wrist, if even that. No, the Surveillance State is set up for us fellas. Guys who, on the outside, appear as law-abiding citizens….yet they harbor that dark secret about being anti-Flock/LPR, pro-privacy, and they have guns too. Nope, gotta keep an eye on those folks. They will be the true threat to our national security. Oh, and because they are anti/Flock that also makes them anti-law enforcement too.
I’ve said it before and it bears repeating: I have ZERO interest in making LE’s job easier by sacrificing privacy. They have done just dandy solving crimes all these years without mass surveillance, and they’ll do just fine without it in the future. This isn’t “cop-bashing” at all, but I’ve not yet heard one agree with removing the mass surveillance tools. They’ll throw out an example you couldn’t possibly disagree with: “We were able to find an abducted child”. Yeah that’s nice and all, but you’d have eventually solved it anyway. Agents of the state, all the way down to a local sheriff’s deputy, have no damn business having the ability to watch us 24/7. None whatsoever.
I also firmly believe that 10 years in prison should be applied to ANY prosecutor or cop involved with “parallel construction”, where they illegally obtain surveillance information and build a case parallel to it so you’d not be able to tell where the original info came from (like NSA surveillance for instance, a la Ed Snowden).
I am also getting to the point that if I were on a jury and Flock/LPR evidence was used by the prosecution, it’d be an automatic “Not Guilty” from me, or at a minimum completely disregarding any evidence presented as a result thereof.
I’d even go as far as making sure the 4th Amendment was followed to the T. I would see to it that ”….particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” would be applied without exception. No more of this “We have a warrant to search for kiddie porn” and they don’t find any, but they do find a bag of weed and the guy gets charged for it. Nope, you didn’t find kiddie porn? Then you’re DONE at that point. Nothing else you “find” as a result of searching should be admissible other than the specific items in the warrant.
Because he presents information.
We get it. Nothing can be a win. We should do nothing. Just bitch.
Something can be a win, but this doesn’t seem to be because nothing has really changed and the only thing that has to occur to completely change things back is a congressional vote to adjust the tax to one cent or greater.
First suppressor purchase without NFA registration in over 90 years…
Well this is intresting.
Good luck getting a dealer to sell you one without a Form 4.
Click on the Link I posted.
Yep. I got an email from a local FFL (in Tennessee) stating they would not be selling suppressors without a form 4 until further clarification from the government.
Guns and Gadgets relays some who, what, where, when, & how info from the attorneys who were involved.
Here’s the Latest.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOX27JlA1-0
BTW He’s saying that the ATF has inspected sellers who have sold many Supressors without papaerwork and they all passed inspection…
