Jefferson's Quran

Not a Muslim, and I have no love for them.

You need to study up on your history, and drop the bigotry.

Sub-Saharan Africa has always been a mess.

In your lifetime, yes. Catholics were quite good at chopping heads off of anyone who disagreed with them. Evangelical Christians are pretty good at blowing up Planned Parenthoods. Not big on US history, but didn’t the US Army get into some battles with the Mormons?

It’s all just people taking their ideals to the extreme. I don’t see many Christians these days opting for Monarchies because “For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God”, or Jews stoning their daughters for being whores. It’s because we’ve largely been over that since 1648. In just about everything you can find bad people. People will continue to do horrible things to each other in the name of something. Many people need a cause to give themselves purpose.

Assuming everyone can behave themselves, there is room for all religions in America*.

*Obviously that does not include predatory cults like Scientology.

If there are Muslims who are capable of being “secular” and not trying to establish mini theocracies within their community I would be 100% accepting of them just as I’m completely accepting of Christians who no longer have witch trials and Jews who no longer stone people to death for adultery and don’t support such beliefs and practices.

Sadly Muslims for the most part don’t seem to be capable of making that step away from fundamentalism and the barbarity that was associated with most religions 2,000 years ago. So while some American Muslims are not terrorists they still subscribe to basic notions like “jihad” and can’t fully denounce terrorism when done in the name of Islam.

This is basically like a 21rst century Christian actually advocating and supporting the notion of a “crusade.”

That would be my guess as well. Happens all the time.

How many muslim countries have you been to? Just curious.

And not just for a few days, but over time.

Guessing, especially when done from a biased and fixed position, does not generally lead to much clarity on a topic in my experience. Your mileage may vary. An interview with the author, as radio and transcribed, can be found here:

http://www.npr.org/2013/10/12/230503444/the-surprising-story-of-thomas-jeffersons-quran

"[i]Jefferson was unique in many ways. He criticized Islam as he did Christianity and Judaism. He talked about Islam as a religion that repressed scientific inquiry — a strange idea he got from Voltaire that wasn’t right — but … was able to separate his principles about Muslim religious liberty and civil rights from these inherited European prejudices about Islam.

“He did the same thing when arguing for the inclusion of Catholics and Jews, actually. He had not very good things to say about either Catholicism or Judaism, but he insisted that these individual practitioners should have equal civil rights. … [Jefferson] resisted the notion, for example, that Catholics were a threat to the United States because of their allegiance to the pope as a foreign power. There were many Protestants who would have disagreed with him about Catholics, and many who would have disagreed with him about Muslims.”[/i]

I would say from many responses in this thread, and version not in line with their pre conceived views, is not of interest. Only thing I take away from it is, some of the Founders were more interested and inclusive regarding other religions other than Christianity, or critical of any religion and I think that’s well supported (and often ignored) by various sources. In fact, some of them were possibly more flexible and inclusive of other religions being part of the “American experiment” than many leaders today.

I don’t think the author is some sort of left wing Muslim apologist, but someone genuinely interested in history and this aspect of it. But, it could also just be an Obama plot to make Islam look good.

Why the current state of Islam is part of this thread I don’t know. I’m not real impressed with the current stats of Islamist nations and their followers either, (1) I’m not real impressed with any religions and (2) it has nothing to do with how a particular Founder looked at Islam in his day (3) there are FAR more secular Muslims than most members here seem to appreciate, but, I also think many of them don’t stand up against the radical fractions the whey they could and should. In the end, only they can really reclaim their country and religion, and it will not be done by avoiding it.

It’s an EDUCATED GUESS based upon having seen the same kind of thing over and over, especially on the internet. Similar to the one that went around about all the Founding Fathers having been Christians intent upon establishing a Christian nation when more than a few were Deist, etc.

And I wasn’t dismissing the point of the article, without question the FF were seeking a country based upon religious freedom. I’m just questioning the specific cites regarding Jefferson and Islam. I’ve read a lot of Jefferson and am quite versed in the Wall of Separation but I don’t recall ever reading the word “Islam” or “Muslim” in his works.

One doesn’t have to go to Alaska to know it’s cold. Islam is the last religion to maintain true theocracies in Saudi, Iran, Afghanistan, Sudan, etc. Others like Pakistan and Nigeria have Sharia law. That means people get stoned to death for crap like adultery.

The only thing that even comes close is Israel and the fundamentalists there but that amounts to little more than getting yelled at for driving a car on Saturday.

But more to the point, it was American Muslims I was mostly referring to. The ones who say 9-11 was bad and that they do not support terrorism but when pressed on their religious beliefs will concede that Jihad is perfectly valid and acceptable under the right conditions.

I have met some secular Muslims from Trinidad who think that shit is nuts and that Jihad is stone age crap. They simply don’t eat pork and some of them actually pray daily. I really don’t have any issues with them. They are simply following a religion to make their life more meaningful and like most everyone else focusing on the good parts and remembering it really isn’t their duty to kill any witch they might come across.

The ones in other countries shooting each other to death at raves/weddings are really not my concern. What I am concerned about are the “immigrants” in W Europe and even here in the US that gang rape young girls and run sex slave rings.

http://www.iris.org.il/blog/archives/757-Pan-European-Arab-Muslim-Gang-Rape-Epidemic.html

http://digitaljournal.com/article/346059

sorry my history is quite fine :slight_smile: not a bigot either

some muslims that are not that bad but ask them do they think one day they will rule all the world pretty much every single one will say YES it is written !
that tells you the end game for you in there eye !
some a small % of all muslims in the world say some that live in the US may be fine and not chop your head off and are quite normal people in most respects ? so again the % of those here that are OK folks are a tiny amount of the world population of muslims that are not OK folks and would just as soon see you dead !

my cuz lives in Dubai has a pretty good grasp on life there ! some of my friends have spent a long time over in those countries even have some friends from Pakistan that got out and from Turkey

its like the slaves they took back in the barbary times you never hear about that in history ? only about a few white folks in the US that were the problem yet slave trade is still alive with muslims but never a peep on main media ? and yet white USA from the past are the only ones persecuted and still are today ! funny my black friends when I lived in the Caribbean have a dif view ! they hate the spanish since they were worse and did most of the ships and trading and hate there own as many of them sold there own out !

so again my history is quite good muslims have been a major problem since the beginning they have no desire to live along side anyone they only have the desire for %100 dominance

will look up what Jefferson said after visiting the ambassador when they were going to war with the muslims ! it will answer why he got the Koran and why he studied it ! was purely to know his enemy !

Most Muslims aren’t terrorists.

But most terrorists are Muslims.

and most muslims are OK with others that do terrorism :slight_smile:

True that one does not need to go to Alaska to know it is cold. But it sure does help if one has experienced absence of heat to know what cold feels like.

I just find this debate lacking perspective.

Before I start, I want to say that I really do not like islamist extremists (as in hate them), and I have several issues with aspects within the religion of islam. I also feel that the secular or moderate muslims need to be more outspoken against their extremist counterparts. As for why they are not, I don’t know. I do not buy into the “silent acceptance” argument. That said, I will never judge a person simply for being a muslim. A persons actions are what matters.

Let’s take one quote from this thread, and use it as a baseline for what I mean lacking perspective:

The ones in other countries shooting each other to death at raves/weddings are really not my concern. What I am concerned about are the “immigrants” in W Europe and even here in the US that gang rape young girls and run sex slave rings.

Are these acts directly attributed to these people being muslim? I am 99.9% certain these actions are not attributed to these people being muslim. They are, however, attributed to the background of these people; cultural upbringing, values taught, gender roles in society and so forth. There are often vast differences between these traditional aspects of their life, and values taught through the study of Islam.

We are seeing some of the same issues here, with immigrants acting with little respect for our way of life, and our values. People who have said in interviews in newspapers that they feel norwegian girls deserve to get raped when they dress a certain way. But that has nothing to do with them being muslim, it has to do with them coming from a country with messed up values and little regard for other people. They have grown up in a society where the norm is to take what you want, dog-eat-dog. If you are weak, you do not survive.

The problem is that many in our society does not want to address this, for fear of being racist. I usually tell these people that the color of their skin has no bearing on this subject, their background does. Many immigrants or refugees are severly traumatized, and it is hard for them to integrate into a western, democratic, free society. For many the transition is too much, and they cannot handle the freedom in a normal manner or become a productive member of society. They opt for a different path. Many who are not granted asylum turn to crime in order to stay; one recent example was an african immigrant who stabbed and killed 3 random people on a bus a few weeks ago. His application for asylum had been denied, and he was supposed to sent out of the country the next day. He was muslim, but that was not the reason behind the killings; the reason was that he was severely traumatized from an upbringing in a war/conflict torn country, and had serious issues. When his application was denied, he did what he knew, and resorted to violence to achieve his goal.

Should we take pity in him for that? I don’t think so, I believe we shouldn’t let these kinds of people in, without certain measures in place to ensure that they won’t do stuff like this. Ideally we could screen people better, so that we only accept people who are not a possible risk to their communitites.

Another example of the naivety we see among the left here in Norway, is a story of two TV personalities who had two african immigrants break into their home. They were stripped naked, bound, and the burglars threatened to kill them. Everything was stolen. They said that after the initial shock, and after having given it some thought, they came to the realization that they deserved to be robbed. That Norway’s immigration policy was too strict, and that we failed with our integration efforts. “White mans guilt”.

We are also seeing an increasing trend of young muslim extremist males leaving for Syria (in particular) and other places of conflict (Somalia) in order to fight.

We also had a government for the last 8 years that, IMO, went out of their way to appease other cultures and religions (read as trying not to offend them). One example is a school district bannng the use of Santa hats for the school christmas party a few years back. The reason? They were afraid that it would appear that they were inconsiderate of other cultures and beliefs. It still happens as well, forgoing traditional celebrations in the name of integration.

I have been to three islamic countries, but only two over time; Kosovo and Afghanistan. The last country I’ve been to is Azerbaijan. There are vast differences between Afghanistan, and the two others, in terms of how religion affects day to day life. Kosovo is what I refer to as muslim light; they don’t eat pork and that is about it. In Azerbaijan I went to a bar and drank whiskey, and there were girls there, without any religious garb/attire. To ignore the fact that there are actual differences between the muslim countries, and how much of an influence islam has on day to day life, is intellectually dishonest (not referring to you).

Yes there are countries that are very strict, like Saudi-Arabia. There are also muslim countries across the entire spectrum, between the strict Saudi and the “liberal” Kosovo.

In closing, Id’ like to adress yet another statement here that also is off the mark:

Most Muslims aren’t terrorists.

But most terrorists are Muslims.

Remember that the person who commited the worst “lone gunman” act of terrorism throughout history is white, Norwegian and is named Anders Behring Breivik. He is a right wing extremist.
Yes, there are many terrorist attacks carried out throughout the world by muslim extremists. The majority, however, are directed at other muslims or muslim governments. Right wing and left wing attacks also fail to get the same amount of attention that muslim terrorism does. The last attacks by muslim terrorists against western countries are tha Boston bombings and the killing of the UK serviceman.

The Norweigan guy political motivation not Religous and he is a drop in the bucket against Muslims terrorists ?
And a rare thing

Why not mention machette killings ? Or knife ? Or plane ? Or attacks on malls ? Or chopping off hands ? Or making kids kill there parents ? Or stoning woman to death ? Or cutting throats etc…

Do we now how many some single Muslims have killed ? Most likely no

Massive amounts have been killed in the name of Muslims conquest
some say around 80 million Hindus
About 200 million Africans
Just to name two places

They will try to do the same to America when they can and no doubt over time the numbers will stager people once again !
Daily terrorist attacks in today’s times are also insanely high thouht the world !

It’s about why he had a Quran ! To know his enemy !

The Norweigan guy political motivation not Religous and he is a drop in the bucket against Muslims terrorists ?

Does it matter the motivation behind a terrorist attack? Is one worse than the other? Is one more legitimate than the other?

BTW, the “norwegian guy” labelled himself a Christian Crusader in his manifesto.

To the best of my knowledge, the majority of their attacks that are directed at other Muslims is because they are seen as either aiding the west, or not being hardcore purist Muslim enough.

And I also don’t know of any other religious or political group that has bred the amount of terrorism as radical Islam. I am open to being wrong.

I have seen this thrown around a lot of times, usually by liberals making excuses and trying to paint the Christian religion as “just as bad”…but how much truth is there to this really? How many times did it happen? Widespread across the globe? Was it one group that did it or one individual? Do other Christians support these bombings? Just wondering.

Mostly it is differences in ideology, ie the fundamentalists attack other muslims not “hardcore purist” enough. Some attacks against ISAF and US/NATO forces in Iraq are because they aid the west. Some attacks are also carried out because they are trying to control the people.

As for no other religious or political group not being as bad as extremist islam, I did not know there was a competition. Comparing radical groups is a fruitless endeavor. The point is that radical islam is the issue. Not all muslims. We must focus efforts on “combating” radical islam. By saying all terrorists are muslim, you are not really aiding that task. We must be aware of causes of radicalization, prevent them and alert the autorities when we see friends/neighbours/colleagues etc. show signs of radicalization.

We will never rid the world of extremism, in any size, shape or form.

Islam as a religion has several huge issues, in that they need the same kind of reform that Christianity had. I think that we are paying everyone a disservice by tip-toeing around sensitive topics in public debate, thereby allowing extreme or outdated thoughts to prosper. We need to challenge certain ideas, and we must motivate the moderate/secular muslims to pick up the gauntlet and challenge the old fashioned islamic thoughts and ideas.

There was a thread some time ago which included comments from a member well-educated in Islamic culture. He highlighted one significant difference between Islam and the other major Abrahamic religions. Notably, the paucity of hermeneutical scholarship (e.g. scriptural interpretation) which, in the Judaic and Christian faiths, has allowed them to “evolve” over time as historical and cultural conditions have changed.

It was an interesting discussion and may shed some light on why “radical Islam” continues to fester in areas where socioeconomic conditions languish behind those found throughout much of the rest of the world or, alternatively, such beliefs can be manipulated for political/social purposes by leaders/groups frustrated and angered by what they consider the “disrespect” shown towards the Islamic world by global economic leaders and the threat posed by Western culture to, in many cases, patriarchal misogynistic traditions.

This thread is great, pretty entertaining so far…

I don’t really consider myself a Christian or Jewish, yet I’ve read and studied the Bible (Both the OT, NT). What’s so wrong with the studying the Quran?? Nothing. There’s also nothing wrong in calling each religion out on its “shortcomings”, as apparently Jefferson did (in the opinion of the author quoted above). I fail to see what the big deal is…sounds like a scholar doing what a scholar does.

Now what one could consider a big deal, especially those that have nightmares about raiding hordes of MUZZZLUMS!!!, is the fact that we are currently (and have been for a few decades) financially supporting radical Islam across northern Africa and southeast Asia…THAT is alarming (that includes weapons, just dig a tad in to what was going on at Benghazi). Another “alarming” factoid is our favorite pals in southeast asia are the Saudi’s, who happen to rule by Sharia, and are in fact Whahhabi Muslims, quite possible the most radical group in Islam…but we’re still great friends with them. Oh ya, they also rule by monarchy, sounds like a sweet setup doesn’t it?

But hey, we love them so radical Islam cant be that bad right?