Anyone catch the interview??? If so, what did you think?
C4
I think she’s bi-polar.
^^^^^^
:lmao:
I think Bill should take his wig off when he’s on tv.
Yesterday she said she was straight.
Personally, I think she is bat-shit crazy.
I think she’s actually fairly normal for your typical self-absorbed self-righteous self-serving touchy-feely wealth-redistributing totalitarian-socialist government pushing commie pinko left-winger elitist.
The true nut jobs are the ones that are going to vote her in as the first female president of this country.
She’s only interested in redistributing our wealth. The Clinton’s are fairly well off, I’ve heard.
Lumpy, well stated. And to think that people of this mentality (and there’s plenty of them) could soon be in power is frightening.
She’s just going to take things away from us on behalf of the common good. Where’s the harm in that?
I truly dont believe that she has a chance to be elected unless Ross Perot decides to jump in and split the vote again. Her husband never got 50% of the vote, and she is far less popular now than he ever was while he was running for office.
A “partial transcript” of the FOXNews interview lives here.
I didn’t see the broadcast, but the transcript reads like pretty soft stuff, with Chris Wallace tossing slow hangers right over the plate. In black-and-white, it looks like she didn’t have to break a sweat and stuck to her talking points.
(If it weren’t for talking points, I would’ve been unemployed for the last 25 years. )
So is that the way it played, Grant, or did the video reveal something that the words don’t?
Sadly, the same might be said of Rudy as well.
Wouldn’t it suck if they are the two candidates.
The horror! The horror!
most politicians are well off…which is why I don’t believe them when they say the rich should pay more taxes.
I don’t think Hillary and Obama are electable.
I don’t think either one of them can carry the South for obvious reasons.
C4
I don’t think Hilary is electable, but I believe Obama is.
Tack
Never underestimate the ability of liberals to do the unimaginable against the resonable.
Did anyone hear her float the trial balloon of “public financing” for elections?
I don’t know what the Witch of the Left has in mind, but I think we’re in need of some serious campaign reform. Just because someone (like NY mayor Bloomberg) has virtually unlimited personal resources should not allow him to have more media coverage/advertisements than other candidtates who have less. I would not neccessarily be opposed to tax payers flipping the campaign bill as long as ALL candidates had to abide by the same advertising budget and were not allowed to accept any donations/free advertising other than published endorsements. IMO, this would be the only way to “level the playing field” and take personal wealth/connections out of the equation.
Also, all debates should include all candidates, not just The 2 Parties.
She looks like she bites.
I’ll be OK with publicly financed campaigns the minute the news/media organizations become nonprofit organizations.