Been hearing about this from other sources.
The most pro 2A administration in history is still going with anti 2A efforts.
What a massive waste of money and effort. Iโm not familiar with Rare Breed or really FRTs at all, but a guy I know was referencing them on the phone the other day. Does Rare Breed continue to sell these and sue everyone who copies them?
From what I got out of that guy and others they have to.
Wonder what will happen to all the FRTs and Super Safeties that came on the market after the original case against Rare Breed was dropped and the triggers ordered returned to their ownwers?
So people had these triggers seized? And then got them back?
1 Like
Itโs gonna be hard to put that genie back in the bottle. FRTs are all over the place.
Neither side of the same coin is in favor of them so there are lots of resources available.
โโฆ.there are lots of resources available.โ
To what end? They gonna go door-to-door? I mean then weโre talking just like a gun confiscation. Many have been sold without paperwork. Whatโre they gonna do about that? That is why I said itโs gonna be really hard to put that genie back in the bottle. Best they can do is ban them (again), hope it doesnโt get thrown out (again), and wait for nosey neighbors to tattletale. I mean it is kinda hard to hide shooting one, even with a suppressor, unless itโs subsonic loads youโre gonna hear it.
With Flock and AI it should be do-able.
East Germany had a thumb on just about everyone with very old school technology.
If something is untraceable, I canโt see how AI or Flock is gonna help. They canโt pick something out of thin air. Now the sound? Different story altogether (maybe thatโs where you meant Flock came in, but it has to be close enough to pick it upโฆ.out in the sticks it isnโt likely). Besides, if they were banned again most people are smart enough to keep them on the down-low; you have it now, you know it works, then youโd just have to reserve it for a โrainy dayโ after that. Oh, and make sure you remove it if you sell the gun!
Wifi is another possibility.
Not sure why going door to door is off the table either.
I didnโt say it was off the table, but that it therefore goes right up there with door-to-door gun confiscation. Unlikely, but certainly not impossible. Things like that tend to teeter on the edge of the abyss. It would be ugly and [hopefully] costly to the agents of the state. It would also likely be a sign of the end of our country as we know it.
Now if you are on a list of buyers and they specifically call you out, then the choice is yours what you do. Random door-to-door would be stupid on their behalfโฆ.you think Minneapolis is giving the Feds headaches! If someone kept records of who they sold to then yeah, they might be looking you up. Same as the MKS remanufactured M14 receivers back in the day: it wasnโt a random door-to-door search, they went to the specific buyers that MKS had sold to (obviously via a 4473, which an FRT doesnโt have).
No reason to think it would be a headache. Almost all elected democrats and a fair amount of gop would be in favor of it which means most voters would go along with it.
Youโre being quite the contrarian these last few days, eh? If youโre talking about specific โvisitsโ based on sales data, yeah youโre right and I think I spelled it out above. Now actual door-to-door gun confiscation? Wouldnโt matter one iota what Dems, RINOs, or your neighbors thought or supported. That kind of behavior would spark a civil war/Northern Ireland โTroublesโ events, and deservedly so. Things donโt occur in a vacuumโฆ.word would get out and shit would disappear (if one was a thinking man). The sentiment, however, would linger and fester and weโd see domestic โretributionโ activities. No one wants it to go there, but often times events dictate actions instead of the reverse. Oh well.
So jsbhike, are you gonna be the first one on the block to โturn โem all inโ in the scenario you imply would be so popular with everyone? I mean we donโt stand a chance, soโฆโฆ
Edited to add: I donโt know what kind of fvcking retarded voters are around you, but here in TN that shit would never be popular or people โokayโ with it. Maybe Nashville, Memphis, or Knoxville (less so), but who fvcking cares what they think!
Getting put through the dui wringer while driving sober seems to be very accepted by residents of the volunteer state.
โ๐ ๐ฐ๐ถโ๐ณ๐ฆ ๐ค๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ด๐ต๐ช๐ต๐ถ๐ต๐ช๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ข๐ญ ๐ณ๐ช๐จ๐ฉ๐ต๐ด ๐ฎ๐ฆ๐ข๐ฏ ๐ข ๐ญ๐ช๐ต๐ต๐ญ๐ฆ ๐ญ๐ฆ๐ด๐ด ๐ต๐ฉ๐ข๐ฏ ๐ข๐ฃ๐ด๐ฐ๐ญ๐ถ๐ต๐ฆ๐ญ๐บ ๐ฏ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฉ๐ช๐ฏ๐จ ๐ฐ๐ฏ ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ณ ๐ณ๐ฐ๐ข๐ฅ๐ด ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฅ ๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ง๐ช๐ฏ๐ช๐ต๐ฆ๐ญ๐บ ๐ธ๐ฐ๐ฏโ๐ต ๐ด๐ข๐ท๐ฆ ๐บ๐ฐ๐ถ ๐ง๐ณ๐ฐ๐ฎ ๐ข ๐ฑ๐ข๐ช๐ณ ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ฉ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฅ๐ค๐ถ๐ง๐ง๐ด ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฅ ๐ต๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ฐ๐ณ๐ข๐ณ๐บ ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ด๐ช๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ค๐บ ๐ช๐ฏ ๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ฆ ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ณ ๐ซ๐ข๐ช๐ญ ๐ค๐ฆ๐ญ๐ญ๐ด. ๐๐ง๐ง๐ช๐ค๐ฆ๐ณ ๐ด๐ข๐ง๐ฆ๐ต๐บ ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฅ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ด๐ข๐ง๐ฆ๐ต๐บ ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐จ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ข๐ญ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฃ๐ญ๐ช๐ค ๐ช๐ด ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ณ ๐ฑ๐ณ๐ช๐ฎ๐ข๐ณ๐บ ๐ค๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ค๐ฆ๐ณ๐ฏ, ๐ฏ๐ฐ๐ต ๐ธ๐ฉ๐ข๐ต๐ฆ๐ท๐ฆ๐ณ ๐ฎ๐ข๐ฌ๐ฆ ๐ฃ๐ฆ๐ญ๐ช๐ฆ๐ท๐ฆ ๐ณ๐ช๐จ๐ฉ๐ต๐ด ๐บ๐ฐ๐ถ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ช๐ฏ๐ฌ ๐บ๐ฐ๐ถ ๐ฉ๐ข๐ท๐ฆ.โ - Tennessee Highway Patrol Col. Matt Perry
Itโs actually not โacceptedโ, it pissed quite a few people off. The number of gun owners in TN far surpasses the number of false DUIs, so not a valid comparison. Also, while not having much in the way of โteethโ, this was done by the legislature:
โGovernor Bill Lee has now signed 2025 Senate Bill 1166 into law. It is now designated as 2025 Public Chapter 327. This law originated due to the investigation by WSMV TV (Channel 4) in Nashville, Tennessee. They requested, analyzed and divulged how hundreds of innocent drivers have been wrongfully arrested for the crime of driving under the influence.
This new law requires the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation to provide a report to the speakers of the Senate and the House of Representatives on or before January 1 each year detailing the instances where no alcohol or other intoxicants were detected in the personโs blood or breath after an arrest for driving under the influence.โ
Also, I might add that TN doesnโt have a Demoshit governor nor did we send Mitch the Bitch to Congress for decades, so thereโs that. So maybe clean up your own shitshow up there before criticizing other places.
I donโt defend McConnell or anyone else in the wrong.
Looks like that law has no punishment for violations.
That syncs with keeping Perry in place after making his position crystal ckearm
PUBLIC CHAPTER NO. 327
SENATE BILL NO. 1166
By Akbari, Bailey, Bowling
Substituted for: House Bill No. 127 4
By Shaw, Russell, Dixie, Hakeem
AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated; Title 6; Title 7; Title 8 and Title 38, relative to arrests
made for operating vehicles under the influence.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF TENNE$SEE:
SECTION 1. Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 38, Chapter 6, Part 1, is amended by adding
the following as a new section:
(a) The Tennessee bureau of investigation shall provide a report to the speakers of the
senate and the house of representatives on or before January 1, 2026, and each January 1
thereafter, detailing the instances in the most recent year for which complete data is available
in which a person who was arrested for driving under the influence under ยง 55-10-401 but
where no alcohol or other intoxicants are detected in the personโs blood or breath.
(b) The report required under subsection (a) must include the law enforcement agency
that made the arrest.
(c) This section is repealed on July 1, 2029.
SECTION 2. This act takes effect upon becoming a law, the public welfare requiring it.
โLooks like that law has no punishment for violations.โ
Uh, that would be addressed by my comment about not having any โteethโ to it.
Well thatโs the norm.
Ca. 2000 KY decreed that all seized firearms be transferred to the state police once any trial need was gone. Le agencies just ignored it. The next legislative session they came back with another law that they meant itโฆwith no penalties. Surprisingly/oddly the le agencies turned at least some in.
Federal and most states(last i checked there was 1 oddball) that did the hurricane katrina โinspiredโ no confiscations during emergencies legislation had no penalties for violations so that will likely occur again to keep most voters happy.