Employees right to keep guns in car

How could I have missed this? From: Story Here

Employees’ right to keep guns in car upheld, but customers can be turned away

Employees’ right upheld; customers can be turned away

BY MARCIA HEROUX POUNDS | South Florida Sun-Sentinel
July 30, 2008

In a split court decision, employees with concealed weapons permits can keep guns locked in their cars at a Florida workplace, but customers can be turned away if they have firearms in their vehicles.

That’s the latest twist on a state law that took effect July 1. On Monday night, a federal judge upheld part of the law allowing employees to keep guns in their locked cars at work, but took issue with forcing businesses to allow customers to do so.

The ruling was good news for retailers and small businesses that own property. They can prohibit customers from bringing guns on their property, even if they have a concealed weapons permit and the firearm is locked in the car.

The National Rifle Association’s Florida lobbyist, Marion Hammer, called the judge’s ruling a “huge win” for gun owners.

In a 39-page decision, U.S. District Judge Robert Hinkle said the law was valid to the extent it compels a Florida business to allow a worker with a permit for a concealed weapon to secure a gun in a vehicle in a parking lot.

Hinkle rejected most of the arguments by the Florida Retail Federation and Florida Chamber of Commerce, which had sued to overturn the law. But he granted a temporary injunction blocking enforcement of the customer provision of the law, saying it was unenforceable and violates the U.S. Constitution.

“If because of the statute a customer brings gun into a business’ parking lot and it is used to shoot a person improperly, the harm will be irreparable,” the judge wrote. He said the business may lose customers as a result.

More court action and appeals may come, but the judge suggested that attorneys confer on whether they want his preliminary injunction to stand or schedule another hearing in his Tallahassee courtroom to argue the law’s merits.

Still, Charles Cooper, a Washington, D.C., lawyer who represents the NRA, called the ruling “a major victory” for gun rights advocates because it upheld “the mother lode” of the Florida law: the right of employees with permits to keep firearms in their vehicles at work.

“We’re 80 percent winners here, and they’re 80 percent losers,” he said.

Anne Marie Estevez, a lawyer with Morgan Lewis in Miami, said Florida’s gun law is now more in line with Georgia law. “It takes the teeth out of it,” she said.

“You can have any license you want, but that doesn’t trump someone’s private property rights,” Estevez said of those with concealed weapons permits.

One result is that businesses that have concerns about the gun law might decide to buy their property instead of leasing space, she said.

Hammer, a former president of the NRA, cast doubt on the effectiveness of the judge’s ruling. “If a business wants to ban customers and invitees from having guns in a parking lot, they would have to put up a big sign that says its OK for employees to have guns in cars locked in the parking lot, but customers do not have those same rights. What business is going to do that?” she said.

She said it’s “too early” to say whether the NRA would appeal the judge’s portion of the ruling about customers.

Adam Babington, legislative counsel for the Florida Chamber of Commerce, said the chamber “feels positive” about the ruling.

“The concealed weapons permit law is stronger than letting anyone at any time bring a gun onto a property,” he said. “Business can continue to make the decision on its property.”

Some work sites are exempt from the law, including schools, jails and nuclear power plants.

Staff Writer Vanessa Blum contributed to this report.

The judges injunction concerning customers on private property is a waste of the paper it was written on and the time it took to pen it.

There are concealed weapons by the metric ton being carried into every venue in Florida. Without private searches, businesses would not know if the customers are carrying, or not. I’ve yet to see a single attempt at a private search by any property owner. If the property owner has a policy that prohibits CCW, the business would 1) need knowledge that a customer is carrying a weapon as defined by state law 2) request the customer leave the property 3) customer refuse to leave. The only recourse is charge the customer with trespass if he refused to leave. A misdemeanor offense.

This is just courtroom grandstanding by the Chamber of Commerce in retaliation to recent laws protecting employees rights to lawfully possess weapons on an employers property.

Geez…what an abortion this is turning out to be, but I guess it is a valid concern from the business perspective. The business owners will have to post a sign outside their establishment which states “No Firearms Allowed”. If they don’t want folks in possession of a gun. Kinda defeats the purpose of the bill. :frowning: FYI: I have seen the “No Firearms Allowed” Or “No Concealed Carry” signs in places in the Tampa Area, but not many.

If your trespassing with a firearm on a property that prohibits guns isn’t that a felony?? That’s considered armed trespassing no?

Not in Minnesota it isn’t. It’s only a misdemeanor (a $25 slap on the wrist at that) if the property owners ask you to leave and you don’t comply.

Now if it’s private property, non-commercial, I believe that would be trespassing regardless of the presence of a firearm.

I think there was a case like this in Arknasas about 6-7 years ago and the employees won that one to. There was no policy of turning people away…
I carried for years at a place I worked that did not have a policy in place. I figured if it was well concealed and nobody knew, well OK. As violence in the workplace escalates, it looks like it only makes sense to allow CC in the workplace…

QUOTE=JaketheSnake;200752]If your trespassing with a firearm on a property that prohibits guns isn’t that a felony?? That’s considered armed trespassing no?[/QUOTE]

Jake, its the same in Florida. A $25 fine. Easily avoided just by leaving when asked. Most cops will tell you to leave or be charged. Most intelligent people will leave when asked anyway.

Not necessarily. They would probably have to prove intent in jurisdictions that do make it a felony. In most instances, they would probably just bar you from ever visiting their establishment again under threat of a trespass charge. JM2CW.

Jake, its the same in Florida. A $25 fine. Easily avoided just by leaving when asked. Most cops will tell you to leave or be charged. Most intelligent people will leave when asked anyway.[/QUOTE]
I may be mistaken, but in reading Gunmatcher’s book it is my understanding that in the State of Florida, there is no fine. It is not criminal trespass (either misdemeanor or felony) to be on a property that has a no weapons policy.

You are right, if you are on a property that requests you to leave (I.e they have a no weapons policy and you are carrying anyways) then the best course of action is to leave (or never give them your business to begin with).

If you refuse to leave then the most that will happen is; The property owner / manager will call the local LEO agency. An officer / deputy will be dispatched. If you hang around long enough for the LEO to arrive, then they will issue you a trespass warning which will bar you from entering that property ever again.

In the future, if you do chose to go back and the property has not rescinded the trespass warning, THEN you will be guilty of criminal trespass. Once again, you have to wait around for the LEO to actually show up and detain you for you to be arrested for criminal trespass.

Mind you this is the State of Florida only.