Another update here… I loaded 15 rounds each at 43.3, 43.5, and 43.7, and then 10 rounds at 45.0, just because.
Today I shot groups of each (rather than round-robin) and took along my chrono.
It was a chilly day (in the 40s F). I kept the barrel warm but not hot, but I do wonder how much the temperature-sensitivity of TAC played a role.
I chrono’ed 10-shot strings of all four loads.
The first three were 2612, 2633, and 2607, respectively.
(That’s right, 43.7 grains was slower than 43.3 or 43.5 grains.)
SD for the first was 16, and SDs for the second and third were both 20. Given that I used the Dillon powder drop on my 550, I’m satisfied with the consistency.
Given that 43.3 and 43.5 grains both shot nicer groups than 43.7, I think that’s the answer.
45.0 grains was 2738fps, and more consistent (SD 10), and it shot a nice 5-shot cloverleaf at 100yds, but the group opened up at 200yds.
By way of comparison, FGMM 168 does only 2508 out of the same gun: obnoxiously slow but very consistent (SD 12).
Oddly enough, FGMM’s 175 load is significantly faster, 2618 (SD 22), and IME, just as accurate.
Lapua’s factory load with their 167 Scenar does 2645, and it’s the most accurate factory load I’ve found. (SD 21)
In case 45.0 grains of TAC under a 168gr HPBT seems too hot, SSA’s factory 168 chrono’ed even faster at 2778.
That SD was only 20, but that SSA ammo has never shot well for me.
Next I’ll load up some more at 43.5 and then go shoot some more…