checked out a "Remington" 1911 R1 at the gunshop today

General Firearms Handguns - 1911
1

it’s price was $619, and they just got it in yesterday.

i didn’t shoot it, but this was what i noticed.

  1. the fit is very unimpressive.

  2. the beavertail safety wasn’t blended to the frame properly, and also had VERY sharp edges at the tang. it was VERY uncomfortable simply to hold it, i can only imagine what shooting it would be like.

  3. the slide/frame fit was not bad, although it did have vertical play.

  4. the barrel to slide fit was awful. when locked up, the barrel had play in it. when the slide was closed, i pressed down on the barrel through the ejection port only to see movement-not good at all.

  5. the barrel is hardly throated at all, and the frame feed ramp seemed rough.

  6. it had an overall cheap feel to it. made in american does not mean much if it’s not assembled properly.

  7. the barrel bushing had a lot of space between it and the barrel-also not good.

  8. the trigger was loosely fit and rattling. it also had about an 8lb pull :eek:

  9. the wood checkered grips were the nicest thing on the gun.

just wanted to pass along my initial impressions. it falls way short of springfield armory’s mil spec.

2

Wonder if they make it themselves or more of the import stuff they have been selling lately?

3

according to their website, they make it themselves in america.

4

If that’s the kind of fit and finish they sell, then I think I’d look at other competitively priced barebones 1911’s…thanks for the heads up.

5

Thats what i was wondering.

Thanks for the info on the pistol OP. I will be at the fun shop next week and will see if they have one. Maybe not all are rough as you say.

6

It would certainly be disheartening should this example prove to be representative of the entire R1 line, though we can’t exactly react in astonishment. Assuming a baseline of quality parts, the difference between a good 1911 and a great one is bench time in the hands of a competent craftsman – and that doesn’t come cheap.

At a sub-$700 street price, it seems unlikely that the R1 is getting much more than a very basic assembly job with minimal fitting. Couple this with the fact that Remington’s in-house expertise with the 1911 is almost certainly quite low at the moment, and you get … well, the R1 that you saw in the shop yesterday.

AC

7

i am not really surprised by this at all…

8

the first thing you’ll notice when you pick it up is how uncomfortably sharp the grip safety is. :eek:

keep us updated, my friend. :slight_smile:

9

i seem to recall predicting another second rate 1911 with this one :o

10

I can’t beleive how bad remington has let some of it’s products go. Sad is all I can say.

11

I’m interested to see how the quality will be over the entire line, since this is just a single example. Hopefully they won’t all be pieces of slop. I guess time will tell.

12

well, i’ve been reading reports on other forums that mention the same quality, so i don’t think it’s just an isolated incident, unfortunately.

if you read the shooting times report too, there were multiple FTF & FTE issues.

i’d have to say, that’s prob the worst fit 1911 i’ve seen in a long time…

13

:eek:

14

I’m chalking this one up to market saturation and price compression. Now that everyone and their brother is manufacturing a 1911, a production model from the likes of a big company like Remington has to undercut the Colts and Kimbers of the world, and still be able to turn a profit.

That means putting out a very basic gun with very basic features and a very basic approach to putting them together. Not that we needed another Auto Ordnance-grade 1911, but when you do the math, I’m not sure how we could have ever hoped for much more. We should have known that this particular blind date was coming with a “nice personality,” and little else.

AC

15

That’s a damn shame.

It’s ridiculous the prices “quality” 1911’s demand these days. It’s cheaper to get a tough as nails carbine than it is to get a tough as nails 1911 it seems. When we start getting up to the 1,000+ dollar .45’s for serious use, you might as well just get an HK45 and be done with it; assuming you don’t have the extra money to burn.

We need a BCM 1911.

16

Unfortunately, it seems you still get a $600 1911 for $600. I’m only surprised that people are surprised.

17

</thread>

AC

18

Not really, they take a lot of hand-fitting and skill, both of which are expensive. Quality steel is also expensive.

It’s cheaper to get a tough as nails carbine than it is to get a tough as nails 1911 it seems.

Of course it is, one was a turn-of-the-century design done when skilled labor was cheap, the other an attempt to apply mass-production and materials advancements from the aircraft industry to a firearm.

When we start getting up to the 1,000+ dollar .45’s for serious use, you might as well just get an HK45 and be done with it; assuming you don’t have the extra money to burn.

Yes, it is 2010. Time to end the romance.

We need a BCM 1911.

BCM are good but they can’t solve production and engineering problems any more than Kimber or Colt can/could/can’t.

B_C

19

BCM are good but they can’t solve production and engineering problems any more than Kimber or Colt can/could/can’t.

I’m not seriously expecting BCM to start manufacturing a 1911. It was more a sarcastic comment on the state of affairs with 1911’s today.

20

I thought that was pretty evident: a solid low-fanfare 1911 that is well-built, and reasonably priceda la the current BCM AR recipe. Of course, it is entirely true that the ingredients aren’t really comparable, as the bench time required to get a 1911 right is always going to be a factor. Not even BCM could pull that off in real terms.

Designs of this vintage, whether we’re talking about the 1911, the P-08 or any other early autoloader, were produced at a time when skilled labor was cheap, and technology was expensive. We find ourselves in precisely the opposite situation today, which is why a good 1911 will still deliver the goods – but it will never come cheap.

Outside of professional and racegun circles, it was really the 10-round magazine restriction in place a decade ago that led to a resurgence in interest in major caliber guns like Old Slabsides. There was a certain practicality to that, save for the fact that people wanted a 1911 that worked at a price that was closer to the Glocks, SIGs, Berettas and S&Ws they had grown accustomed to during the Wondernine years.

The market responded … but not very well. Colt failed to innovate. Kimber delivered more features at a decent pricepoint, but used a lot of cost-saving MIM components to do it. Without running down the full roster, what emerged was the general idea that you were rolling the dice with a sub-$1k 1911. You could do all right at $1,500 or so, and if you really became a student of the design, $2k would get you into premium semi-custom territory.

It was a migration for most, until the ban ended, and suddenly the market was again split in two: those who had grown to think that an expensive 1911 was still the right gun, and those who were just as happy to go back to the much newer (and far less costly) polymers. Many companies have tried to reinvent the middle ground, where less than a Grand would net you a decent entry 1911, but as we’re seeing time and again, it simply can’t be done because of the labor costs involved.

How on earth I ever ended up jamming out this missive is beyond me, but the R1’s MSRP tells you everything that you really need to know.

AC