I disagree, at least to a degree.
The whole, they like pistol sights… meh, most people I know have a hard time hitting with pistol sights at any appreciable range. Granted, an Ak sight picture is more effective beyond the 10 yards that most run their handguns out to, I don’t have issue making hits at 50 or 100 or beyond with my one AK, but my hits are more precise with an AR with irons. Now part of that is the AR with irons I am more familiar with, and I also feel that the aperture can help improve hits with it with shooters who may have less than idea eye sight. As far as a precision shot goes I’ve always found an aperture style sight to be more precise, and I’m not talking compared to the AK I’m talking compared to the style of sights on an AK a la Mauser, and the like. As far as low light. Maybe the AK has an edge here, if running solely irons, if no illumination devices are used, a la white lights. But, then how far out are you going to be able to see with miniumal light away without trying to illuminate the target? At which point my personal experience has never shown my AR irons to be hard to acquire in that regard. Even in night time shooting, if I can see enough to shoot I can get behind my irons.
Let’s take a moment for me to digress here. My father once told me about a story his uncle told him. His uncle had served in WWII as a firearms instructor since he was too old to serve in the front line. Now, i also think he was in WWI as well, but I am not sure. Anyway, his uncle was a shooter, and quite good. And used to talk about how he felt the aperture sight was far superior to the standard blade and notch, describing his ability to make hits with a rifle like the M1 with an aperture compared to something like a Mauser to almost being like having a sniper rifle because it was so much more precise. Thought that was interesting.
Anyway, With an aperture I can shoot circles around something with a blade and notch sight. Now, where it may have an advantage is in fast close range shooting, but that can be debated as well to some degree, and once you start slapping on RDSs it becomes moot. The advantage there really comes down to having a less cluttered sight picture at that point, but again optics.
The battle zero argument I don’t see having much weight or the detachable sight argument as far as the AK’s sights are zeroed and forget it if that is what you are pointing out. And here is why. If you set up an AR with the sights it was designed for, M16A1, the rear drum is not going to be easily jacked with. At which point is then becomes then easier for someone to zero and AK and then have the rear jacked with, moved to longer zero, and cause issues with then making hits at range since the rear is then no longer at the zero the user expects. Simple fix, but still there. Also, the AR irons on an A2 or the like are too easily adjusted, ect. Well, I’ve never seen how they would be adjusted under use without the operator being involved. I just don’t beyond an impact that jars it loose, at which point I’d say an AK would have greater concern with this with the front sight than the AR would in my opinion. The argument that the sights can be fiddles with is a personal discipline issue, not a gun issue, sorry.
Now, I’ll take a step further here and really piss in the cherrios of the AKs for the end of days die hards and do that the difficulty in zeroing an Ak, more in that it is less precise(Impact on target is 1 inch left of point of aim, make two clicks, bullseye with an AR opposed to an AK, impact 1 inch right, erg, how much do I move the sight now?") Now I know a lot are going to go, well I zero once and never have to worry again, which is kind of silly, but what if you end up with ammo shooting way the hell different from your original zero? I’ve got ammo that shoots on the magnitude of 4-6 inches different left and up in one rifle’s case(No, if you are going that the AK is best for end of days or zombies, or pink pillow puff aliens, you have to accept that you may just unload or urn out of ammo and have to use stuff you rifle doesn’t like because ammo is in short supply. How you going to effective if you don’t know where the ****er is hitting?). How much more ammo am I going to burn trying to zero an AK, if you even can since I’ve seen guys weld the ****ing front sight drum so stop it from wandering, than the guy with an AR and ability to easily and quickly even, adjust them with a bullet.
As far as the detachable argument, if you’re throwing on an optic, it going to be detachable on either of them, and if the mount is good and the optic solid I don’t see much issue this day an age. A detachable rear sight has never caused me issue, zero it, witness mark the screw or bolt holding it, throw some blue locktite on it to make sure prior to bolting it on, and I don’t worry. I could even go so far as to stack the damn screw if I really wanted to get paranoid. Non issue in my mind.
All that said, both are still viable, I just don’t see the AK being markedly better to persuade me to go to it, even less when optics are involved. I would also argue that if it really was the shit that you would see the deign for irons more often than you do on newer rifles. Perhaps they have more merit on close in weapons, a la an SMG, which some argue the AK is really more of an overgrown SMG than an assault rifle and that then doctrine becomes accuracy by volume, but we are the USSR, and we don’t train for human waves, the mindset here is going to be more hit what you aim at and make your shots count.
Excuse me while I go pull on some nomex.