Will this ruin Sarah Palin? Denial of protection kills four while she was mayor?

http://politicaloutcast.com/2013/05/bombshell-mayor-sarah-palin-denied-police-protection-to-family-resulting-in-their-murder/#.UY0K5nk1D_U.facebook

Hmm…not cool.

Edit, This is really about Hillary.

Yep, RIF.

I figured out it was a MANBEARPIG before I was halfway thru.

And really, if there is anything negative in Sarah’s history, it would have come out a long time ago.

Obviously there would need to proof she did nothing.

Like there is for Hillary.

While I get their point, this kind of shit posing as “factual news” wastes everyone’s time.

“I assume you have now figured out what this post is really about. For the record, all the claims made about Sarah Palin in this post are fictional and written for satirical purposes. The post is really about Hillary Clinton and the Benghazi scandal. If Sarah Palin or any Conservative had done anything remotely similar to this they would have been crucified by the media.”

Well, I guess folks here do read links and posts afterall.:):smiley:

And really, if there is anything negative in Sarah’s history, it would have come out a long time ago.
LMAO… the dirt didn’t even start to come out when she was selected for V.P. You want to know why she hasn’t run for any other office in Alaska, or signed on to run for the Senate seat in 2014? She can’t, her name is so tarnished and trashed (for good reason) in Alaska that she’s a political nobody up here now. If the Lower 48 “conservatives” actually knew of the bullshit she pulled up here they wouldn’t worship her so much.

I like her because nobody can get under the libs skin like Palin. They hate her so much and the fact that they hate her so much gets them spun all the more.
:smiley:

I thought that’s when the left wing MSM scoured for anything they could throw at her. Wasn’t that like 6 or more years ago? I would of thought if there was anything else they would have found it.

She’s pro 2A / NRA. That makes it alright with me. I’m over the right eating their own. It’s not often you see any dissension on the left.

I guess the national media doesn’t feel like covering that stuff?

Ruin her for what? Being a pundit? Being a mayor of a small town. Being a half a term governor? Like my old man said about Clinton “the only thing being governor of Arkansas qualifies you to be is governor of Georgia”. Can’t imagine what Palin is qualified for.

She’s more qualified for President than what we have now, and if you had read it all you’d know that it’s just a satirical comparison to Hillary’s screwups and the way the media covers them up.

Somebody didn’t read the link.

My point was that Govenor Palin is not qualified for much of anything. If the Republican Party puts its faith in her then we are looking at 4 more years of democratic rule. Other than being pro gun, how is she qualified to for national office.

Please, tell us how Palin isn’t more qualified than Barack Obama?

Experience tells me that. Her train wreck economically would have been just as big as Obama’s. She couldn’t manage the economy and personnel of a government for a state of 700,000 people. She likes to claim she cut the state budget, but her budgets were as big as anything our state has ever had. She did cut the capital improvement budgets to the tune of 500 million, but her operating budgets were huge. Then, her plan to try and get a natural gas pipeline gave 500 million to a Canadian company to encourage it’s development but not tied to actually building the pipeline. Her tax plan against our largest industry, oil production, has reaped to benefits for our state and the industry is in a decline. We are currently digging our way out of that mess. Her administration was full of underhanded backroom politics, even though she ran on a promise of transparency.

So, if miraculously we had gotten Palin in the presidency I guarantee we would have still had the bank bailouts and the trillions in debt. We would not have had Obamacare. We still would have had the gun control debates because the Democratic senate would have still pushed it. Things like Benghazi still would have happened under her weak ass leadership.

Meh… just a pretty face with a fake midwestern accent that knows how to give good speeches. The fact that she has virtually zero support among republicans in a very conservative state is called a clue :wink:

There is plenty of negative in that witches history (Sarah) but now she is pretty much a nobody.
pat

Nice straw man argument. Got me there. You win. One has nothing tondo with the other. Obama wasn’t qualified either but we are talking bout Palin.