Why Should I?

:confused:
Current household inventory includes a 5.56 RRA M4gery and 5.56 RRA pistol. My teenage son got a stripped DPMS receiver for Christmas. So, we now have the option of buying/assembling the next upper in either 5.56 or something else, which may or may not include my 5.56 carbine upper moving to the new lower. [Weaving our way carefully thru all of the “constructive manufacture of an SBR” BS.] I do not hunt; the purpose of the new version of my carbine will be SD. Tell me why I should go out on the 300 BLK (or other) “shiny new thing” limb, instead of buying 62 gr M855 and maybe reloading to 68gr for another 5.56. My 5.56 ammo inventory is “sufficient for my needs”, as they say. Another caliber requires me to reload rifle rounds in addition to my handgun reloading. I’ve gone down the route of “different is better” with computers too many times.

6.8 SPC? There is no cheap ammo on the market. I’d be loading everything I shoot.

300 BLK? Even shorter baseline.

.450 Bushmaster or .458 SOCOM? Even deeper into the well of “too unique for my own good” calibers.

I regret building a 6.8. As soon as funds allow, I’m turning it into a 5.56.

If you want opinions, I wouldn’t build/buy an AR in anything but 5.56 today. Regardless about what people claim will soon come to market, it hasn’t yet. I like the .300AAC idea, but I’ll be the last person to buy it after all these “soon to be released” parts and ammo variants hit the market at reasonable prices.

Prepare for all the flavored opinions to follow…

There are much better options than M855 available.
https://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?t=19881
I would not focus on another carbine if you don’t have at least a few mags loaded up with some of the better performing 5.56 and have taken a couple of carbine classes. You with training and a 5.56 will always be better than you without training and the greatest round ever.

The 6.8 and 300 BLK will both have much better barrier and terminal performance than the 5.56. Most of your training can still be done with a 5.56 carbine and cheaper ammo.

I’m a big 6.8 fan, and have owned a few big bore AR’s. With that said, and given the purpose of the rifle I would go 5.56. No point in rapidly expending expensive ammo into targets at short/intermediate ranges. Also there are plenty of 5.56 loads out there that will serve you well for defensive use.

If you hunted, the 6.8 or big bores would give you a significant advantage over the 5.56. But for training and (non-work) defensive use the 5.56 is tough to beat.

I appreciate the input, especially given that I (almost) hijacked the thread.

Go with a 300 BLK, all you need to change is the barrel and your back to 5.56.

If you’re looking for an inexpensive round that’s still decent for SD, you should look at 5.45x39.
I know Spike’s and S&W make uppers for it. Pretty sure there’s a few others and lots more options if you can build an upper yourself.
There’s plenty of russian surplus ammo still out there. Its usually around 140ish for 1000rds.

If not I’d just recommend sticking with 5.56 as has already been said.

I would stick with what is known and what is readily available IMO. If you want something new, get the 5.45 upper and be done with it.
Just my .02