I just noticed that there is a poll over at townhall.com asking who is worse… the results are:
Mel Gibson (1 %)
Eric Holder (54 %)
The NAACP (12 %)
The New Black Panther Party (23 %)
Roman Polanski (10 %)
Holder - he is the head of the Department of Justice and what little brain matter he had to begin with has been replaced by that of a Lemming!! :jester:
So the most popular choice is an ant-semitic, homophobic, misogynistic, abusive alcoholic prone to uncontrolled rage?
Says more about the people voting than those being voted on.
Mel’s behavior appears to be alcohol-induced. That is not an excuse, but aids in understanding.
The Black Panthers call for the murder of white people based on their race. Definitely worse than Mel.
The NAACP is an organization pursuing a platform specifically designed to be racist, in contrast to Mel’s impulsive outbursts. So the NAACP is also worse than Mel.
Eric Holder has corrupted an entire branch of the U.S. government to pursue policies which favor one race over others. Not quite as bad ad the Khmer Rouge, but again worse than a drunken outburst.
What that they’re smart enough to recognize when a person’s failings have absolutely zero impact on their daily life or society as a whole? Who gives a wet fart about a celib-retard?
So they interpreted “worse” as meaning which has the biggest deleterious effect on their lives and society? What does that say about them? Enlighten us.
Try to keep things in perspective.
Wow, you mean one of the top Democrats is coming up last on a largely conservative website? SHOCKING!
Holder. He has the use of force via .gov to backup his assertions and opinions. Mel just rants and has no effect on my life in any way
About as shocking as your predictable response.
How do you explain the lower scores for the NAACP and NBP on such a “conservative” website?
It might have something to do with the Justice Department white-washing an investigation, refusing to properly interrogate would-be terrorists, releasing russian spies and otherwise engaging in policies that subvert the very justice they’re charged with upholding.
Just a thought.
At least the stuff Mel says is funny and can be made into awesome prank phone calls, the stuff Eric Holder says can be scary.
Roman Polanski “only” raped one girl, Holder has the power to rape us all.
Wow, it didn’t take long for the White Guilt brigade to show up.
HOLDER.
When compared to blatant racists who advocate murder and violence…yes Mel would be the more popular choice.
Please show me non-drunken evidence that Mel Gibson is all the things you claim he is. He may be, but things said while drunk in no way show that. Many of the epithets attributed to him are used by people as ways of hurting others, not at face value, but as cultural epithets.
Ie, calling some one the n-word or a “fag” or a “bitch” or something as often as not is not used to show racial disdain or homophobia as much as to cause hurt to someone due to the cultural implications of the words rather than really believing them at face value.
This is a cultural thing that most people have absorbed. Being mad and drunk and saying such things is just as likely to only be an attempt to hurt someone as it is to be a reflection of actual values and beliefs.
The people with whom he associates, and his actions, even when no one is looking, when not drunk, are more likely to reveal someone’s true attitudes and beliefs than when said in a drunken rage.
Have you ever said things to someone you love, when you are mad or drunk or whatever, that you did not really mean but were trying to hurt them in your rage? I bet most of us have (either when mad, or drunk, or both). I know I have (and I don’t drink, I was just mad).
Holder/NAACP/NBP calculatingly use race and racial tensions to advance their political agendas.
Given that measuring stick, it is obvious that Mel Gibson is the least of our worries and the least racist of the bunch.
Why are there 2 threads about Mel Gibson on M4C?!?! :help:
Eric Holder.
How many men and women have fought and died for this country so people can vote.
Mel Gibson
Actor-who cares, there’s probably hundreds of thousands joe shmoes with his same views.
NAACP, New Black Panther both racist organizations, different paths.
Huh? Mel only got 1% - how is the “the most popular choice”? :blink:
Mel’s rant and racial slurs are nothing more than the ramblings of another Hollyweird Actor gone nuts. What he says or do has no bearing on my life. The Black Panther and the NAACP are both racists organizations - the only difference is how they execute their racist agendas.
Eric Holder is ultimately more dangerous than any of them because of the position he was APPOINTED to. For all we know he could have already instructed the FBI or some other alphabet agency to record everything we post on M3Carbine.net just because we dare say anything negative about him and his master.
You think they don’t? :dirol:
Now that they have power, they are not even that much different about how they are racists.
http://hotair.com/archives/2010/07/19/breitbart-hits-naacp-with-promised-video-of-racism/
[quote\]"We are in possession of a video from in which Shirley Sherrod, USDA Georgia Director of Rural Development, speaks at the NAACP Freedom Fund dinner in Georgia. In her meandering speech to what appears to be an all-black audience, this federally appointed executive bureaucrat lays out in stark detail, that her federal duties are managed through the prism of race and class distinctions.
In the first video, Sherrod describes how she racially discriminates against a white farmer. She describes how she is torn over how much she will choose to help him. And, she admits that she doesn’t do everything she can for him, because he is white. Eventually, her basic humanity informs that this white man is poor and needs help. But she decides that he should get help from “one of his own kind”. She refers him to a white lawyer.
Sherrod’s racist tale is received by the NAACP audience with nodding approval and murmurs of recognition and agreement. Hardly the behavior of the group now holding itself up as the supreme judge of another groups’ racial tolerance."[quote]
agreed!
the sad part is they each have more responses than, for example, the Goldman Sachs thread which is far more important. sad state of affairs when we’d rather discuss mel gibson than a company who is systematically tearing apart our country for their own greed and profit.
As pointed out by several, including myself, in the earlier Mel thread - for all his psycho ranting, Mel has no power.
He holds no office, controls no institution, and has no funding for his politics. He’s the most popular choice because he’s by far the safest choice.
Eric Holder, on the other hand, holds the most power. I’d have voted against him myself in this poll, but the funny thing is, it’s not his alleged racism that worries me, it’s his obvious gross incompetence.
The NBPs are pretty heinous in that they do advocate violence, but are still fairly small, so I don’t take them particularly seriously.
The NAACP doesn’t worry me. Yes, they’re a racially based organization, but not a violent one and last I checked it wasn’t a crime to run a non-violent racial advocacy group. I don’t think they’re really necessary in today’s context, but they also don’t concern me on any meaningful level.