Does anyone know which sets of rail panels are the thinnest? I am trying to keep my rail as slim as possible. I know ladder rails are obv. the thinnest covers but I am just trying to figure out which panel types are the thinnest.
I’m actually working on compiling that data. I have a chart on my site with the dimensions of various rails as well as the weight of various covers, and am hoping to get some “width added to rail” dimensions on the various covers added soon.
Totally without any facts to back it up, I’d agree that the XTM “feel” thinner to me. They are certainly very light.
The XTMs feel no different to me than KAC panals. I have some XTMs on a KAC RAS that’s uninstalled right now and I can’t tell a difference in width from when I had the KAC panals on the rail.
The new TangoDown SCAR panels are also very thin and offer a secure grip and do not abrade my hands. If there is any movement with them on the rail , it can be easily fixed with a soldering iron applied to the locking tab .
WTF is “Combat Beige”!?
Why can’t we regain our senses and call it “brown”?
:rolleyes:
Back on topic-
I prefer the XT rail panels but am looking forward to sticking the SCAR Panels on and see how they work. They look to be a great cover, but I am not really how much better you can really do until you are just being different without any performance gain.
Military Moron did a write up a while ago on his site HERE, and you can see a comparison between the original TD, the TD SCAR, and the KAC HERE.
I used KAC panels for years but recently switched to the SCARs. The SCAR panels are thinner than KACs or Magpul XTs; or at least feel so, because I haven’t busted out the calipers and measured them. I have not used the Magpul XTMs. The SCARs are the best panels I’ve ever used - lightweight, thin, nicely textured and they lock tightly to the rail with no movement. I just wish they were a bit less expensive!