We’ve danced around this question is several threads (as I found from doing a search) but I’m curious to know what everyone’s choice is in terms of height, swivel or not, etc.
It will be mounted to various AR carbines via a Larue QD mount, if that matters.
6-9 Swivel model with notched legs is my choice.
I personally like the TD unit better though.
C4
I like the TD too, but IIRC it attaches via screws right? I guess I could make it QD by attaching it to an ARMS rail, but at $200 for the bipod plus the QD, it gets rather expensive for my purposes.
Brownells has the following info for the Harris models.
1A2 bipods have solid base and do not swivel or rotate.
Series S bipods rotate 45° for instant leveling on uneven ground.
Model BR: For benchrest use.
Model BRM: equally spaced height adjusting notches.
Model H: For prone/sitting.
Model L: For bench or prone.
Model LM: Notch only height adjustments.
Model 25: Three Section legs.
Model 25 C: Extra tall, three section legs.
Heights
6-9"
9-13"
11-25"
13-27"
I’m thinking the 1A2-LM, 9-13" Bipod would work for me.
I have been wondering the same thing about the BIpods. Rob let me know what you decide on. Do you think the Larue mount is a must? Are there other QD mounts on the market?
LMS - this is the 6’ - 9" notch only swivel model - add to that a quick throw lever to lock/unlock the swivel and a short braided paracord lanyard to the legs for rapid deployment.
I’m using the 6-9" swivel model on my AK that I like very much; enough height and small enough when retracted to fit in a vest packet. I usually shoot from the 6" position with a short magazine. I installed a stud kit (for the AR15) in the lower handguard as an attachment point and that has worked out well, keeping the legs close to the handguard when folded. If you use the adpater, the legs will be that much further away from the bottom of the handguard when folded.
Grant, the TD bipod looks great! How long are the legs when retracted?
Rob
I use BRM-S model 6"-9" with LaRue mount on my SPR. I really like that set up. The LaRue mount is useful when I’m at a range and need to re-zero my other AR’s. 95% of the time the bipod resides on the SPR.
Paul
I picked up the Ergo QD used on line. It’s seems pretty solid. It is a good chunk of steel to have on the end of your Rifle. If you don’t need to rapidly remove or attach your Bipod I wouldn’t bother with it. Attaching and removing a Bipod isn’t very hard without one of these Devices anyway.
I am looking for a Harris for a 700P build and asked the same question over at the Lightfighter Precition Rifle board:
HELP!, kind of a beginner’s question thread, toward the bottom, member KUTF answers my question:
HBLM model (Harris Bipods LM). Or the HBLM-S if you want the swivel version.
The recommendation was a Harris with notched legs and swivel if you want it.
BTW, if you’re thinking about the PodLock accessory, you can get the same hardware MUCH cheaper through an industrial fastener/hardware supply company. I’ve got a link on another computer that will save you about $20.[/quote]
Here is the “podlock” link: t-nuts.com
Hey everyone has their preference in which Harris configuration to use I was using 9"-13" HBL-S …I was recently given a series 1A2 Model LM from an Ex SEAL shooting buddy of mine…
I believe because of the lack of instability with the “S” (Swivel feature)it brought my groups @ 300 yd from 2MOA to 1 -1 1/2 MOA. The extension of the legs with the notches vs the non-notched legs I was using is like night and day. I have had problems with the non-notched sliding under the weight of the Rifle. and adjusting them without the notches are less than Ideal
The notched legs setup is much more effecient of a set up for me and I really like the rock solid feel without the swivel “S” feature.
Just my .2c
Here is the “podlock” link: t-nuts.com[/QUOTE]
What size “T-Nut” should one order for a harris bipod “S”…
That’s exactly the kind of feedback I was looking for, thank you!
I have settled on a BRM-S with ARMS throwlever attachment, mostly because another member here who happens to be a shooting buddy offered to sell me his. 
I called t-nuts and the guy was very helpful. He said all of those bipod lock handles on this page will work with a Harris bipod.
That’s what works best for me as well. I have both the swivel and non-swivel units. I prefer the swivel unit on my varmint rig.
Let me know how you like it as I need one.
The 6"-9" is too short for prone shooting for me. 9"-13" with swivel and friction lever option is what I use. I switch it out between my bolt gun and AR.
kel3at, Is that because of the gear you have on?
I. INTRODUCTION:
A. This is a review of the Bi-Pods that I have or had in the past.
II: BI-PODS:
A. Harris 6-9” BRM-S.
Pro’s:
a. Very stable.
b. Ideal height for shooting off the bench and in the prone.
c. Cants and has spring-loaded legs.
d. Good price.
e. Good weight.
f. Deploys fast.
g. Multiple mounting options. Can be mounted to just about any weapon.
Con’s:
a. Does not traverse.
Conclusion.
a. What all other Bi-Pods are measured by.
B. Versa-Pod Model 51 7-9”.
Pro’s:
a. Ideal height for shooting off the bench and in the prone.
b. Cants, traverses, and has spring-loaded legs.
c. Good price.
d. Good weight.
e. Deploys faster than the Harris.
f. Multiple mounting options. Can be mounted to just about any weapon.
g. Can be mounted using the Versa-Pod VFG.
Con’s:
a. Not as stable as the Harris.
Conclusion:
a. Best used on Precision type of weapons.
C. Tangodown ACB-4 9-11.5”.
Pro’s:
a. Very stable.
b. Lighter than the Harris and Versa-Pod.
c. Cants and Traverses.
d. Silent leg deployment.
e. Built-in mount.
Con’s:
a. Expensive.
b. Too tall for shooting off the bench.
c. Due to the way it is stored, a VFG is pretty much a must have.
d. Limits the way you can mount a weapon light. Requires the cord remote switch.
e. Can only be mounted to a weapon with Picatinny Rails.
Conclusion:
a. Best used on Combat type AR’s.
D. Grip-Pod.
Pro’s:
a. Lighter than the Harris, Versa-Pod, and Tangodown.
b. Fastest to deploy the legs.
c. Doubles as a VFG.
d. Very rugged.
e. Built in mount.
Con’s:
a. Not as stable as the Harris, Versa-Pod, and Tangodown.
b. Too tall for shooting off the bench.
c. Since it is also a VFG, it is hard to find the proper spot on the rail for it. If you have it too far forward, it won’t be very effective as a VFG. If too far back, it won’t be too effective as a Bi-Pod.
d. Does not Cant, Traverse, or adjust for height.
e. Can only be mounted to a weapon with Picatinny Rails.
3… Conclusion:
a. The ideal Bi-Pod for a Combat type AR, Patrol AR, 3-Gun AR, and Hunting applications where a light weight Bi-Pod is preferred.
III: CONCLUSION: (In order of preference.).
A. Best for Precision Weapons:
B. Best for Combat Weapons: