In my efforts to lose body fat, I was advised to ditch most of my cardio; just lifting and perfecting my diet has moved me along this goal very nicely. I’m envisioning adding conditioning back in to my routine, but my primary focus will remain on strength training, and so I’m looking at the best way to structure my program.
I’ve read a couple articles on Periodization for weight training, and for cardio they recommend HIIT for when you’re lifting high intensity/low volume, and lower intensity endurance cardio for periods when you’re doing medium-low intensity/high volume hypertrophy work.
That seems nonsensical to me. Why pair high intensity lifting with high intensity conditioning? And high volume lifting with high volume conditioning?
Doing max barbell work (80% of 1RM and above say) regularly and attempting to do legit HIIT as you point out, you’re going to over train and or get injured. You’d need to periodize intensity, volume, etc to account of added stress of legit HIIT, which is very taxing on the system.
My understanding of pairing HI lifting + HIIT is that you’re basically treating your HIIT as another set or two of your HI lifting. Meaning, if you’re doing 8 sets of 2-3 reps @ 80%+ of your max on squat/dead/bench/press, then you would lower that volume a bit (to maybe 5 or 6 sets) and add in HIIT to make up for that volume.
You can end up overtraining on anything if you don’t keep your volume (and intensity) in check, so you probably shouldn’t just pile it on top without adjusting for volume or at least working up to that volume. You’d just have to play with it and find what’s right for you. But I’ll just say that there’s very few non-professional strength athletes out there in the GP that are in ANY danger of over-training…as long as good recovery techniques are being performed.
Another thing to keep in mind is that your cardio shouldn’t (and really can’t) be exclusively HIIT. Vary it up and be smart about programming it in your weekly workouts. True HIIT sessions should probably only be done 1-2 times per week as a part of a well rounded S&C program. As an example, I’ll typically program in a long(er) steady state recovery run after a HI squat day (which may or may not include HIIT cardio on that squat day) mostly for the recovery aspect, but also to develop a larger base of aerobic capacity. Rowing, swimming, biking, and moderate intensity interval runs make up the other sessions that I’ll see during the week.
I’ve heard that a HIIT session should be considered another strength training session, when you consider your weekly plan. That’s interesting though to actually base your lifts based on the next HIIT session.
Oh no, I’ve over-trained several times…twice-daily cardio plus a strength training session, 6 days a week. For months, straight. Yes, I’ve been there. Recovery? I used to not understand at all it was needed. Now after each workout day I have a recovery day, where I only do a brisk walk (and, lately, yoga). When I add conditioning back in, it will be in the morning, with strength training in the late afternoon, so as to keep that whole day off afterwards.
Several of the studies on HIIT I’ve seen indicate that adaptations peak at 6 weeks, then taper off rapidly. So, that is my plan going forward: 6 weeks HIIT, then switch to moderate/low intensity for the next 6 weeks. Then, a full week off. Repeat. I’ve been at this for years (and I’m down 163 pounds), so I like to take the long-term view.
Biking, rowing, and swimming are the modalities I’ve seen recommended for non-HIIT conditioning. Not running, which is said to compromise recovery.
There are a couple guys here who have said they often follow a strength training session with a (very) brief HIIT session. I hoped guys would share what they’ve found to work in this thread.
HIIT does have cardio in it so youre not ditching cardio. Youre just inyegrating it with weights. Ive found HIIT to be the most effective in weight loss.