I’m 5’06" / 150lbs. The padded version is a longer than the standard VCAS. But if you sinch down the middle section of the sling as much as possible, the lenght is not a problem.
From my understanding Blue Force Gear is shortening the length of the pad on the padded version by a few inches.
In this thread I wrote why I prefer the padded VCAS and you can see pics as to how short I have the middle section of the sling:
I was talking to Ashley Burnsed at Blue Force Gear a year or so ago about something unrelated and he asked what I thought of a padded version of his VCAS sling:
https://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?t=12270&highlight=padded+VCAS
[i]At the time I told him it was unneeded.
A few months ago I tried one and I simply didn’t know what I didn’t know. I was so impressed with the padded version that I’m in the process of changing ALL of my VCAS slings over to the padded version.
The padded portion of the sling won’t chaff exposed skin, it slides over gear more easily (not that I ever had a problem with the standard VCAS, but the padded version slides over gear more easliy), no buckles on the portion of the sling that goes over your shoulder and around your back, etc.
Both the padded and un-padded VCAS slings are awesome, but for me after trying both, I much prefer the padded version.
Pics of my using the padded version in Pat Rogers class last weekend are posted on page 52 in the “AR Picture Thread” that is tacked at the top of this section.[/i]
I ran the padded VCAS sling in Pat Rogers (EAG Tactical) 3 day carbine operators course earlier this year, and had no issues relating to the length of the sling:
https://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?t=15210
I’ve been running the VCAS sling for about 2.5 years. My preference is for the padded version, but you can’t go wrong with either version.
S/F,
Jeff