TWS Dog Leg rail/dustcover for AK

So I’ve been playing with a Texas Weapons Systems (TWS) version 2.0 dog leg dust cover. It actually holds zero, at least with a peep sight and a 1x red dot. Some things cowitness on it, some things don’t:

  • Burris FastFire II: too high
  • 30mm UltraDot in Warne low rings: too high
  • Aimpoint Micro on low picatinny mount: lower 1/3 cowitness
  • Primary Arms micro clone: lower 1/3 cowitness
  • An Eotech a buddy loaned me at the range just for shits’n’giggles, wayyyy to high (no suprise there, but you could still shoot it).

The dust cover hinges off of where the original rear sight goes.

To compensate for variation in receiver length, there’s about half an inch of length adjustment. The two sections of dust cover have a sort of channel interface to prevent any rotation or side-to-side movement. To install it, you loosen up those 2 machine screws, slide the back end so it fits snugly, then torque the screws down with threadlocker. If these screws ever came loose, it could throw off your zero but otherwise shouldn’t affect weapon function.

At the rear, the cover locates against the left side of the receiver. There’s a tab built into the right side of the cover that acts like a spring to keep the back of the receiver’s left-right movement under control. Up-down movement of the dust cover is controlled by the recoil spring assembly. Unlike a regular AK recoil spring assembly, TWS’s piece has an angle on the underside. The recoil spring pushes that chunk of metal to the rear, and the angle on it keeps the dust cover shoved firmly downwards. End result: you can open up your AK, slam the dust cover shut again, and it still holds zero. I haven’t tested with a magnified optic, but this thing was punching prone 10 round 1.5" groups at 50 yards with no change in zero. I’d fire a group, open up the dust cover, do the hokey pokey, turn around, close it up again, and fire another 10 round group. There was no appreciable shift in zero for 3 magazines of that, even with the gun heating up.

The rear peep is also pretty sweet, but if your front sight has round ears you have decide whether you’re going to use it HK style (center the ears in the peep), or regular style (center the tip of the front post in the peep). Works either way, though this can cause issues with shooters not knowing which way it’s zeroed. Oh, and the extra long sight radius is WONDERFUL.

I stuck a Primary Arms gen 7 micro dot on it since aside from an actual Aimpoint or several Wal Mart grade optics, the PA is one of the few things that will cowitness. It’s not a bad little red dot for what it costs, but if money were no object I’d dump it for an Aimpoint.

So there are 2 reason why I got the TWS dust cover:

  1. Ain’t got no side plate on this AK.
  2. I always manage to burn my support hand thumb on Ultimaks. Plus you get to keep more wood on the gun, and wood is awesome.

How fast can you pop the dustcover off to clear a case or round that’s gotten caught up in the action?

As fast as you can push the button on the back, and lift the cover. The cover will open to around 140 degrees.

It opens the same as a regular dust cover. The only thing pushing the tenon into the hole in the dust cover is th recoil spring, and the recoil spring is unchanged. Press the tenon in, and lift the cover up.

The key differences are:

  1. the dust cover is hinged and pivots where the standard rear sight would go.
  2. the tenon’s bottom surface is angled. As the recoil spring pushes the tenon aft, the angle forces the back of the dust cover downwards against the rear trunnion.

I like this. Thanks for the pics.

Cool, that’s what I was hoping.

There was some kind of apeture sight that replaced the dust cover called a Tech Sight or something that was totally dicked up.

You needed 3 hands minimum to take the dust cover off.

I fired a friend’s AK equipped with a TX Dogleg.

We slapped an Aimpoint Micro on it. It seemed to hold zero for the few hundred rounds we shot.

The peep sight that can go at the end of it is a nice touch.

after owning a good bit of dust covers i do have to say that one looks as if to be done correctly
whos the main distributors?

Edit.

Love the TWS on my Mini Draco

MadDog :smiley:

I put an RS Regulate on my rifle. Its about perfect with an Aimpoint Comp ML3. It cowitnesses no problem, its easy to remove the dust cover and clean the weapon. I looked at the TDL but opening and closing the dust cover over time just has to result in some POI change. You don’t have to be a mechanical engineer to see the possibilities for POI change.
I like the optics mount welded to the side of the receiver, its there for a good reason.

The Tech Sight was a total failure…

I bought two of those things, and couldn’t even get them to fit on the rifles, so never even got field test them…

Here you go.

http://www.onesourcetactical.com/kalashnikovriflescoperailtopcoverdoglegscoperailgen-2.aspx

So I don’t really care all that much about cowitness; that said how was your cheek weld with the eotech? Anyone else have input regarding the Dog Leg and Eotech set up? Thanks!

If they could develop a robust way to make windage adjustments at the rear (to compensate for canted FSBs) that would be perfect.

Yeah, the AK ones just look goofy, so I never tried them, but the SKS ones are, IMO, a game changer.

Looks like the TWS DL uses the entire left side of the dust cover as an indexing plane for proper dust cover alignment, is that correct? If so, relieving the left side of this dust cover for a left hand side charging handle would be a major no-go I imagine. Anyone have an educated guess on this? Would milling a relief allow the dust cover to have too much flex or prevent it from indexing as solidly as required?

*******UPDATE

Here’s an excerpt from the email I got directly from TWS regarding the Lightning Bolt mod I have on my AK (left side charging handle):

“Our rail may be modified to work with the Lightening Bolt.
Be sure to retain the rear most inch (2.5cm) of the left panel intact for stability.
Yes, it will maintain zero.”

The index point is near the rear of the left side of the cover. I do not believe it uses the entire left side of the cover, at least it doesn’t appear to with my example.

Personally, I’d be more concerned with creating a big opening in the side of my rifle that had no cover.

Isn’t Suarez bashing their turn around time and comms on his forum? I figured he would be dropping them already.

Not so long as there’s money to be made… He’ll probably justify it as OST is the only place you can get TWS topcovers that are quality and hold zero.

If you want one, do yourself a favor and go to the source…

http://texasweaponsystems.com/

Even if it did take a lil longer getting shipped, I’d still feel better knowing I didn’t put any more money into the shill’s pocket.

They definately seem to be the best hing on the market for mounting an optic above the receiver.