Actually, if the agenda being hidden was keeping promises made during the Constitutional debates that wouldn’t be so bad. Sort of an opposite of the usual deal kind of thing. Highly unlikely, of course.
I get the feeling a lot of President Trump hires were given the “Come with me and drain the swamp speech” and then replied with “hell yeah, let’s drain the swamp.”
Then After being hired were like “Holy F-ing shit you madman, we were just saying that. It’s line your pockets time dumbass, WTF are you doing?”
And the president is like “I already have a billion dollars jackass. Quit dicking around getting rich rearranging chairs on the titanic and actually help me with the wheel and try to miss the iceberg.”
Trump may be no trained captain or navigator, but I think he really means to miss the iceberg while other jackasses that claim to be up for that are just there to wheedle a seat on a a lifeboat.
While the USMC May revere one of his recent fires, when the chips were down, what did he do for SOF? At best a hard call that preserved resources, to most a chicken shit Dodge.
So this guy is NOT going to help us.
Barr supports Gun Confiscation Orders: "... it is critical that we get an effective system in place that keeps firearms out of the hands of mentally ill people... A key part of any such system are laws that allow 'Extreme Risk Protection Orders' [aka Gun Confiscation Orders]." (Barr answer to Sen. Cornyn Question #1.)
Barr explains why he could still support the semi-auto and magazine bans that he supported in 1991: "I would look for ... whether [the] burden [of a gun-control measure] has a sufficiently meaningful impact on crime to justify burdening a fundamental right..." (Barr answer to Sen. Kennedy Question #3.)
Barr could possibly support the elimination of the 3-day period for completing a NICS check -- thereby allowing the FBI to block a purchase forever, without knowing if the individual was a prohibited person: "I also have not studied whether changes to the three-day waiting period are advisable. If confirmed, I will review this issue along with other issues affecting public safety." (Barr answer to Sen. Feinstein Question #43.)
Barr refuses to answer whether he believes concealed carry reciprocity legislation is constitutional: "I ... am not currently in a position to opine.... The question of whether the Second Amendment, or any other provision of the Constitution, would require one state to recognize another's concealed carry permit is one I have not considered." (Barr answer to Sen. Feinstein Question #44.)
Barr punts on whether a federal ban on bump stocks (which would also affect semi-autos) would be legal: "I would be pleased to review any legislation on this issue." (Barr answer to Sen. Feinstein Question #45.)
Barr supports the Lautenberg misdemeanor gun ban, which takes guns away from people who engaged in shouting matches in the home: "I look forward to working with you and the Committee on this important issue." (Barr answer to Sen. Feinstein Question #46.)
Looks like Rand Paul is a “no go” on Barr:
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/02/11/rand-paul-vote-no-barr-1164436?cid=apn
Hopefully we can get some more!
I am getting an error code on theat link in the previous post.
Should work now
I still don’t get this whole Barr thing. Did Trump appoint him so he -would- be rejected for some reason? It seems like by now someone should have figured out something and everyone goes… OhhhhK, now I get it… like it or not, but at least it would fit some puzzle. Barr is like a non sequitur in the Trump statement for a new AG.
Take heart, President Trump is playing 12D chess. Yeah, that’s it.
The idea that anyone still believes Trump has any sort of consistent ideology or any clue what he’s doing makes me wish it were true.
I’d like him to take a bunch of hallucinogens so that he could smother his ego and step aside which I believe he really really wants to do…but won’t because he’s terrified of a media narrative that says he isn’t great. I firmly believe he would do it if he thought he’d get approval from all those who don’t like him now.
The current batch of democrat candidates could be beaten by anyone who is remotely decent and not a full blown socialist. Well, maybe not Mike Pence…but if we’re voting for people without experience I’d be all in on Dan Crenshaw.
Today he called out Art Acevedo at a LE press conference, to praise him. I wanted to punch my TV. :mad:
Well…you wanted the 80s back…
You wanted a Reagan, just without the charm.
I still maintain Ollie North did nothing wrong
Fly, bless your heart, did you fall down and hit your head?
Hey, everybody’s tried to fund Right Wing Death Squads in the Banana Republic.
Everybody! You see college is a time and place for self-exploration and experimentation…
Don’t act like you never thought about!
Somebody’s gonna have to get his AOC Army M16A1s and M2 Carbines.
See…YOU understand, FJ.
You understand…
I dunno what it is about like brown latin broads in OG-107s but it causes me to overlook a LOT of things. Double Plus Bonus for Para FAL.
I don’t know Firefly… the women of the IDF has them beat hands down.
+1
Deleted
Well it looks like he got confirmed. Oh great.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk