First off - 16’’ and CQB should never be in the same place together.
Second - Is NiCorr becoming more popular? They’re the second maker I’ve seen this from. I love this coating (Amazing on LWRCi rifles) and was wondering if anybody knows where I can get it done. If it’s available.
Third - Not that I’m considering buying one, but what’s the general consensus on Troy AR uppers?
People use 16" for CQB every day. The military uses 20" for CQB, and quite effectively. NiCor, I know nothing about, but LWRC is using it and they make some very high quality guns.
Kyle Defoor has a couple of entries on his blog Re: the 16" Troy CQB upper. He just built up a new carbine wearing the new Troy upper after shooting out the barrel on his DDM4.
Should be easier to clean too (does something to the pores to close them off or fill them with carbon.)
If one of the guy’s that have LWCR rifles that have the newer barrel could chime in with there experience that would be great.
Spike’s WAS selling as 410 SS treated barrel that was branded by Adam’s Arms that they (Adam’s Arms) had made by somebody else. Adam’s Arms rep would not tell who made it. Someday I will get around to install that barrel.
By the way was a good reading info on that page about the process.
A word of caution; there is a small gun company in Utah(they make a different rifle) that had some barrels treated and they had to be tossed out since the process messed up the barrels. Or so the story goes. Variablebinary MIGHT be able to shed so light on that, maybe it this is the same guy over on a different forum.
I had an LWRC M6A1 with nitride CHF barrel. I didnt find it any easier to clean than a chrome lined barrel. Just ran a bore snake through, and that was it.
It was a good barrel. Very accurate. If there a rack of rifles, spotting the LWRC’s is easy because nitride barrels have a very distinctive look
And Robinson Armament found that nitride can make an M&M effect on barrels where you have this very hard outer shell, but very soft inner core, which is not a good thing when the barrels are pushed hard.
They were nitriding everything on the M96 back in 2000, so they have quite a bit of experience with the process
Agree on the cleaning. Still takes forever to get the copper out.
My nitriding folks have been advising me to stay away from treating stainless barrels, specifically very hard stainless like 410 or LW. Another thing they’ve reported back is that some companies have used to heavy of a treatment which can cause the nitrided surfaces to shear from the substrate. Actually IIR correctly, this what Noveske experienced when they were playing around with it on stainless test barrels.
Were working up to cook one here in September. I’m actually ordering the blanks for the test today. Were going to bench a carbine and print groups at intervals as a non-scientific test. We’ll also be measuring throat erosion. We’re going for carbine testing this time to focus on durability versus my previous (again non-scientific) before and after accuracy tests.
Joel Kendrick of MMI-Trutec has been melonite treating barrels for a few years. He’s a benchrest shooter and has used his barrels to win alot of matches. I believe with AR barrels that there was a problem with the extensions coming loose after treatment. I asked Joel about this and he said they revised the process for AR barrels to prevent this from happening. I would say if you want a barrel done to e-mail Joel at joelkndrck@aol.com.
Funny you mention that Joel has done all of my barrels. The extension issue is definitely resolved. Joel and Mike are great guys and do a fantastic job. If anyone needs a barrel ran through them, let me know I can always include it the ones I’m sending down.