Troy Claymore Muzzle Brake Review Video

AR/M4 AR General Discussion
1

I picked up this brake to test for an upcoming SBR (short barrel rifle) build and wanted to test if what I heard about the brake was true. Well, it is. Pros––-greatly reduces the perceived noise level for the shooter and it reduces the blast to those on your side. Cons––-slightly more perceived recoil. There was very little and statistically insignificant difference in bullet performance but the data is posted below.

Video

Chrono Data:

62gr HP Silver Bear 223

Birdcage-2741fps. 1034 ft/lbs of energy
Claymore––2733fps. 1028 ft/lbs of energy

Full write up:

Review page

2

You noticed more perceived recoil, was it a stronger push back, or muzzle rise?

Would also be interesting to know what kind of decibel change there was down range between the two.

3

I should have been more clear, I apologize. It was a slight increase in push back. I was able to stay on target just fine with it but there is a slight increase in recoil. But, if you were looking for an option with less blast directed laterally and toward the shooter this brake will do that.

4

Thanks for the review. I too, am interested in the decibel differences downrange and to the sides as well.

5

I don’t have a db meter but I generally wear double ear protection (inserts and ear muffs) but with the Claymore I just used the inserts and it wasn’t loud at all.

6

For me, I noticed muzzle rise with the Troy muzzle brake which is a reason why I removed and sold it. I did like how the sound/blast was all directed forward though.

7

I noticed muzzle rise with the Troy muzzle brake

I think for a non SBR, the midevil may be a better option due to what you and I both observed.

8

i have the midieval and i love it! it does reduce recoil a bit in my opinion. i wish it didnt look as tacky thought…