Trijicon Tripower review

Hello to all! I thought I would ad a quick review of the Trijicon Tripower sight for those considering a new optic.

I have the latest generation Tripower, and I really like it alot. THE CHEVRON RULES!!! I had the first generation Tripower as well, and the latest is a nice improvement over it. The new aluminum body is very solid. They removed the cylume stick back-up source, which I think was a good idea. The only issue I have with it is the low brightness of the tritium. It is almost invisible in complete darkness without NV, so in low light/complete darkness, you must use the battery to power the chevron. It was dimmed down a bit to be more compatible with NV, as the earlier generation Tripowers had a slightly brighter tritium. I feel the new Tripower is as good or better then the Aimpoint IF you have access to NVG. Without NV it is still excellent, but it would be nice if Trijicon made a version of the Tripower with an ultra bright tritium for use in low light/complete darkness without the use of NV. The extra cost of the Tripower will turn many shooters looking for a new optic toward the Aimpoint/Eotech option, but I feel the new design along with the chevron make the latest Tripower a great choice. It also works perfectly with all of the LaRue Aimpoint mount currently available which is also one less thing to worry about.

I’ve never looked through a Tripower, but the thing the I like about Trijicon is the crispness of their illuminated reticles compared to Aimpoints and EOTechs.

Thanks for the review. A couple of follow-up quetsions if you don’t mind:

How do you compare the Tripower to an EoTech or Aimpoint during daylight hours?

What about low light (dawn/dusk)?

Considering I don’t have NV gear, when you mention the shortcomings in complete darkness, is this a case where can you ID your target but you can’t see the chevron or are both invisible? Would you be ina situation where you need a white light anyway in which case the tritium intensity is a non-issue?

I have used both the Eotech & Aimpoint, and the Tripower is as good or better during bright sunlight without the use of batteries. The fiber optic donut works perfectly in every condition I have tried so far. Some situations, where you are in a shaded area, aiming toward a light background in bright sunlight, you will need to use the battery power to brighten the chevron.

In very low light situations you will be able to see your target the same as with the Eotech or Aimpoint, but the chevron will be barely visible due to the low tritium brightness, requiring you to use the battery.

Its nice to see that Trijicon (like LaRue, Magpul, and TangoDown) listened to end-user feedback when making the new revision changes. I would however, still contact them about the dim tritium. Most importantly, to see if yours is defective. Remind them that you owned the original version. How do you know that they really changed to a dimmer H3 element on purpose? Maybe all the new ones are as bright as the old ones, and you just got a bad apple. They’ll offer to check it out for free, but who knows- Maybe the tech will read your problem and swap in a bright element for you at no charge! I’ve had all sorts of nice surprises happen when my units where shipped there for CS work.

If they did say there was a change, or they inspect it and you end up with the same, at least then give them your feedback and simply let them know you liked the brighter H3 better.

Thanks for the nice review Nick!

I spoke to a rep at Trijicon prior to the new sights release, and was told that the dimmer tritium was one of the new features on the Tripower to make it more NV friendly. I will contact them and give them my feed-back, and see if they can install a brighter tritium in my unit. Thanks for the suggestion Kisara.

Good review, Nick. Can we get a shot through the scope for perspective?

Sorry for the delay! Here is a pic that I found a while ago. Not sure of who the original poster is:confused: It is much better of a pic than I could manage.

Here is another pic with a view through an Aimpoint 3X magnifier: (I definately need to get one)

First off, great review. I wish there were more feedback on the net about this optic.

Did you ever find out if you can get your tritium brightened?

I guess I don’t see the point in having the tritium there if it is not visible (except via NVG’s).

Let us know, as I really want to like this optic, but it seems to keep falling just short of greatness.

One other question… I’ve always liked the chevrons and triangles. They are nice and large (easy to pick up quickly), but you can use the tip for more precise shots. Do you find this any more/less accurate at distances than the Aimpoint or EOTech?

Thanks for the info…

I am going to call Trijicon about the tritium when I get back in town from vacation here in beutiful Colorado. My Father lives near Buena Vista, CO. and has a awesome public shooting range located in the middle of the Rockies with a 500+yd. rifle range about a mile and a half down the road from his place. I Brought my MRP/Tripower and My 6.8 SPR build for fun. I have owned and used both the Aimpoint & the Eotech, and find the Tri’s Chevron (using the tip as you described) to be far better with distance shots than either of them. I will update when I get back in town.

Thanks for the info. I’m going to give one a shot. I like the idea of having a similar reticle to my TA31F, for consistency and all that crap. :stuck_out_tongue:

Got my Tripower today! I immediately opened it up and mounted it on the LT cantilever mount that came also (Thanks Grant!!). If Nick doesn’t mind me hijacking his thread, here are my first impressions…

It came with it’s own mount! I did not expect that at all. I didn’t use the included mount, but it appears to be a low mount. Not quick detach.

The tritium (Power 1) is weak to the point of being non-existent. It should be called a Doublepower, cuz that’s all it is. In reference to our discussion above on a possible tritium defect, the manual claims “Check the tritium lamp for failure…in a darkened room… It is important to let your eyes adjust to the darkness before trying to see the tritium.” Ok, so I went in my bathroom and tried this and low and behold I could make out the reticle. However, as soon as I lit up the room with a flashlight, I lost the reticle.

The fiber optics (Power 2) are ok. I can pick up the reticle while moving thru a dimly lit house, but it doesn’t stand out real well. Outside, it is again, ok. Maybe comparable to my Aimpoint ML2 on a medium setting.

The battery backup (Power 3) is just fine. With this power source, this is as good or better than the Aimpoint. I’d even go so far as “better” since the reticle is larger and therefore faster to focus on (for me anyways).

The buttons for the battery power suffer from the same problems as the older Eotechs. Not very user friendly. Hard to “feel out” when not looking at them. Might be better if they went to the more tactile rubber buttons like the newer Eotechs or just go to a switch like an Aimpoint.

The manual says the battery power is good for 10 hours constant use. It has a 2 hour auto-shut off feature. I’m not real thrilled with this. It’s obviously way worse than the Aimpoint and Eotech. It wouldn’t be near as bad if the tritium worked better, but unfortunately I foresee having to use the battery power in all low-light/night situations (and I work midnights, so…).

Batteries are 1/3N, and it came with two sets.

It has a cover for the fiber optic donut on top and a neoprene sock a la Acogs.

I really like the chevron reticle and find it much more superior to the Aimpoint and Eotech reticles.

Pros:
-Excellent reticle.
-Battery-saving options (Fibre optic illumination).
-Compatible with Aimpoint mounts.
-Rugged build.
-Comes with a mount.
-Comes with two sets of batteries.

Cons:
-Tritium is useless. I almost have to question if it’s even there.
-Low battery life.
-Auto shutoff is a little too quick, but considering the low battery life, this may be a good thing.
-Cost is ~$100 more than a new Aimpoint. It does come with a mount though.

I feel it is a toss up between this and the Aimpoint. I think if I had to choose right now, I’d be a bit torn. Some sustained use, especially in low light is going to be the deciding factor.

So, from an early perspective, and not having shot with it, I must say I’m a little disappointed. I’m still planning to keep it and I think I’ll shoot better with it (which is the main goal), but I had hoped for a more efficient lighting system. I am taking it to work tonight so me and the guys can play with it on the job and compare it a bit more to the Aimpoint.

Once I re-installed my newly chopped (to 14.5") MRP barrel back into the MRP, I only had to make a couple of VERY minor adjustments to the Tripower to get it re-zeroed.

I was able to shoot this group off of a sandbag at 25yds. (20rds. “rapid fire”) shooting 75gr. TAP. The Chevron helps me take much quicker follow-up shots than either the Aimpoint or Eotech. At least it sure seems like it does.

Heres a pic of the Chaffee County public shooting range. What a back-stop!:smiley:

I shot mine finally, using my 16" midlength homebrew. It was really more of a function test (first build and I just wanted to make sure I put it together correctly) while using some wolf ammo, but I’m rather pleased. I’ll be back out to fine tune a zero and see what kind of groupings I can get with better ammo this next week.

So far I’m pretty happy. Preliminary tests at night have been rather positive. The sight is very doable in the dark w/o battery backup.

I’m not a fan. Here are a few pics I did a while back after I noticed that the fiber collector glows like a stove element at night if you lose the cover.


Close up to it


About 10 feet away


Through PVS-7Ds from about 15 feet away.

Yup, it glows to be sure, but for civies and basic patrol cops, stealth isn’t as much a concern.

I spoke to Trijicon CS today, and I explained that I am just a lowly Detective from a half-assed PD, who will never have access to NVG, and would like a brighter
tritium element for use in darkness/low light. I was told to send mine in and they would see what they can do for me. He said they should have it for about
10 days. I will let you guys know how it turns out.

Please do Nick!!

Well???

Any updates from Trijicon?