Trijicon TA33 Green Horseshoe, my observations

I recently sold my TA33 GH and several people asked me why. They were in the market for one and wanted to know my opinion on it. Just in case there are others out there, I thought I would combine most of the PMs into one post and put them out for everyone to argue with me about. :smiley:

Things I like

-Outside between dawn and dusk it is great. Any ambient light at all and it glows very visibly and it automatically adjusts if you walk into/out of shade.

-No batteries

-Extremely clear/bright glass. Phenomenally bright actually.

-Outside, during the day it felt just as fast as my Aimpoint. This is all “feel” I don’t have a way to time it.

-I love the reticle. One of the things my brother and I do is get “jocked up” (basically just my G19 and a Eagle Chest rig with 6 mags in it) and walk about a mile or so into an empty field (after planting season)and shoot at targets from 100 to 550 or so yards. The Aimpoint is not as easy to use compared to his Eotech XPS which has the the reticle that has an extra dot for a “BDC” which is a very useful reference point for shooting out a long ways. Even though the TA33 BDC doesn’t match for a 16” AR, having those reference points wonderful for walking in shots.

-I use an Aimpoint M4s and from 11am to 1pm I have to have the reticle at setting 15 to make it really noticeable. (one away from max) I think sometimes that I would rather have a 4 MOA dot. I worry in a TEOTWAWKI scenario that the batteries will be dead quick since the “8 year” battery life is only good at setting 12 and I am 3 settings higher. The fiber optic and reticule size on the TA33 makes it very bright and noticeable.

-The TA33 is EMP proof. The Aimpoint MIGHT be but the TA33 IS. Not that this is something I worry about, much…

-I could see through the glass without my glasses on, the reticle is fuzzy but the view through the optic is clear. Kind of weird actually.

Things I don’t like

-Inside, it doesn’t do so well for me. It doesn’t do well at all behind a flashlight for me. Sure, it turns black but that is invisible against complex or mottled surface like a stone fireplace. Against solid colors like a black TV screen the green is visible and against a white wall the black reticule is visible. I could somewhat overcome that by covering up the objective. But it still is only as bright as the tritium, which means it is visible if you look for it, not stand out draw my eye to it bright. It is basically the same as having night sights on my handgun behind a flashlight. Yes I can see them, and they work if I look for them but they don’t jump out and draw my eye to them.

-The BAC works for me, but only when the reticule is very bright, which means inside and in the dark is not very good, even with a cover on the objective to use as a OEG, it is still difficult for me to see.

-The tritium glows back through the fiber optic as well. So if you have your rifle slung in front of you, there is a dim but visible line right on your chest. Visible to even non dark adjusted eyes. I noticed this when passing a mirror walking through my house playing with it and a flashlight, it is pitch black in my house.

-I used the stock TA60 mount which is good for the height when standing but even then the FSB gets in the way depending on head position. If I got right up NTCH it pretty much disappeared but the further back on the stock I got (even just a little bit) the FSB becomes much more prominent. Much more than just a “Blur” more like an evil FSB ghost haunting the optic that you can see through. :smiley:

-I also didn’t like the TA60 mount on and off method. If I ever had to get the optic off quick, it wouldn’t be very fast, especially not compared to a Larue throw lever.

-From about 10 am to about 2 pm CST the sun causes a bad reflection on my FSB that greatly exacerbated its distraction. (Like a miniature ghost with a Surefire shining it in your eye) I used a Sharpie to darken the back of my FSB post and ears and it helped some but it was still a lot more than a “little blur” in the bottom of the FOV (everyone else must have better eyes than me, I had problems with the TR24 too). This was with the optic butted up to the front of my Troy BUIS, it was better if I ditched the rear BUIS. I also don’t shoot NTCH, I am about 1 inch back, that probably didn’t help matters. I have tried shooting NTCH, but my natural point of aim is right at an inch off the charging handle.

-I would have to use Butler Creek scope covers which are cheap and flimsy and pop open just sitting in the safe (based on my experience with hunting rifles). I have owned 5 sets of them and only one set that I got years ago has been worth a crap.

-While playing around I noticed that in the prone position, I had a lot of trouble getting a good view through the optic, I kept getting half moons through it or no view at all unless I held my head up off the stock just a little bit, which means it really needs to be lower (like a 1.5 Larue mount) which means the FSB will be even more of a problem.

-Finally, while playing around with the TA33 my dogs started having a fit about 9:30 pm, I figured it was another dog walking by or one of the cows in the pasture across the road based on the way they were barking. So I went outside to investigate with a unloaded rifle and the TA33 mounted. I apparently surprised the dogs when I came out since they immediately started excitedly barking at me, I swung the rifle in their direction instinctively and hit the light (I really like my light setup:D). Their kennel is about 25 yards or so from my front door. I got caught up in the excitement and there was a moment of extreme panic because I couldn’t get see the reticule or my dogs just an indistinct blur and movement. I immediately lowered the rifle down and noticed it was just my blonde lab bouncing up and down excitedly like he does when he thinks I am going to let him out. Once I calmed down and concentrated I could see the reticule fine, maybe I could train that out but that moment of panic really stuck in my mind. But that is one of the big uses for my rifle, figuring out what my dogs are barking at in the middle of the night. So that pretty much killed the deal for me along with the other things above.

Most of my experience over the last 30+ years of shooting has been 75% shotgun, 15% pistol and only about 10% rifle. Most of the rifle shooting has been with open sights from Crossman BB guns to Marlin Lever actions on up to AR’s/AK’s/M1A’s. I have used magnified optics but generally only for very specialized applications, not general use. Most of those specialized applications revolve around stationary targets like paper targets, crows or ground hogs in a field or very small targets that aren’t moving very fast at 75 to 150 yards (muskrats on a lake). Most of my dynamic shooting with a long gun, like crows, rabbits, dove, coyotes, skeet are taken with weapons without magnified optics, so that makes me most comfortable with a 1x view. I spend most of my time/money training with my G19 since most of the time, if I am armed, that is what I will have with me, the other shooting is incidental to other hobbies and not specific training.

I believe that I would be better off getting an optic that will fit what I DO with my rifle versus trying to PLAN for an eventuality that hopefully will never come. I think I am better off having an optic that I am intimately familiar with that is not ideal for the situation rather than an ideal optic that I don’t run as well because of lack of familiarity. It also keeps me from chasing the next best thing.

I think someone who has Folding BUIS and who has more experience with magnified optics and is willing to spend the time and money to train out any issue they have with it would really, really like it.

Caveat Emptor. I am not tactical at all. I don’t have any military or LE experience. My competition experience involves a single GSSF match that I placed 11th in (I would have placed 5th without that procedural for getting carried away and shooting too many poppers). I have taken one pistol training class with a not very well respected trainer. I am basically a Fudd with SHTF delusions who likes guns. So take my advice with that in mind.

I hope this might be valuable to someone looking at the TA33 themselves.

Good story, thanks for sharing your experience.

How did you like the green color? Do you think a different color would have solved any of your issues, or created new ones?

I’m planning on buying a TA33 and I’ve been trying to decide between red or green, chevron or horseshoe. I’m leaning towards the TA33GH because I imagine the horseshoe reticle would be a little faster at close range and that the green would stand out in a greater number of situations versus the red.

I’ve got a colt 6940 which does have a folding front sight, so hopefully that won’t be in the way.

I tend to think of things in the exact opposite way. I see a lot of people get dragged into selecting gear that’s best for the game, the class, the plinking, the varminting, etc. and then turn around and state that this is their “SHTF” gun. I don’t buy it, in most cases. I can certainly see the argument you are making, that if the optic you choose works for the types of shooting you regularly do then you’ll hopefully be passably proficient with it if you ever need it, but I prefer to see the argument the other way 'round in that if you use the optic you’ll need when “SHTF” for everyday use you’ll become much more proficient with it in both applications.

The ACOG, and the TA33, require sustainment training, no doubt about it. For me, I prefer to use the tool in the training and practice environments so that I know I’ll be proficient with it if I ever actually need it.

I see exactly the opposite, people buying guns and gear in case “SHTF” or some other paranoid fantasy scenario and stashing it away in their safe only to be taken out once every few months to do some plinking off the bench. Then again if you hang out with 3-gamers for the most part you experience may differ.

I am excluding that group entirely. There’s not much point discussing them relative to the topic at hand.

I see it slightly differently.:stuck_out_tongue:

I see alot of people getting dragged into buying gear that SME’s are using because it works best for them without taking into account that their usages aren’t anything like the SME’s and as such wind up with an optic that is never actually used for it’s true function.

That being said, I definitely see a point to what you are saying. I actually tried that. I scoured the boards, and asked SME’s opinions (yours even:D) and I tried several optics out personally.

What I feel I discovered for myself is that I needed to tailor my optics to what I do, rather than what I do to my optics.

With my situation I don’t train as much as I should. I very seldomly train just for the sake of training (except handguns), alot of my shooting is related to other hobbies and uses.

I think if I were more serious about tactical training and/or matches like you are, I would probably prefer the TA33. I can see where it has some serious advantages, and the disadvantages that it has can be trained out.

But like you said, being a perishable skill, I felt it better to choose an optic that played to my strengths and that I would take the least amount of money/effort on my part to become proficient with.

Hey, I’m lazy.:smiley:

I really liked the green color. I don’t think that the color had anything to do with the issues that I had. I had more of a problem with the magnification and the brightness of the reticle after dark.

I have looked through a chevron reticle, I have fired a several mags through a HK 416 (on full auto:D) with a red horseshoe and I had the green horseshoe TA33. I have also had a TR24 with a green triangle.

I MUCH preferred the horseshoe over the triangle/chevron. I have trouble picking an aiming point with the triangle/chevron. It looks good on paper but it doesn’t work for me.

I did have a little trouble with the green disappearing on me against a tree line. But I was laying on my side in the floor of my house, looking out the sidelite of my front door at trees about 200 yards away. The green just happened to match exactly. I don’t know that red would have been any better since the reticle was not lit at all. Outside in daylight I never had a problem.

Definitely get the Larue mount if you can, especially since you have a folding front sight. You might be like others and not notice the front sight, but if you are like me and don’t shoot NTCH you might benefit from having a front folding sight.

OP,
Thank you for posting your observations. I was almost convinced that this was the optic for me…until you convinced me otherwise. It sounds like a person would need a non FSB upper to make this optic work best. I still see pictures of ARs with FSBs equiped with ACOGs so in some cases maybe the shadow of the FSB is not as prominent. I think you pointed this out.
Thank you for the post. Back to pondering for now.

Glad I helped.

It is a VERY NICE sight though.

If you shoot NTCH it won’t be as much of an issue. I don’t, so it is more annoying to me.

If I had a folding front sight and mounted it in a Larue mount, I believe it would have been much better.

Ok, its not totally out of my mind or anything. Thanks for the info.
It would be my first ACOG. The big thing for me would be the FSB ghost as all of my ARs (except my LMT MWS) have FSBs. I wish I could look through one mounted on an AR just to see for myself. I am a NTCH shooter so maybe it would be ok. Thanks again.