The H&K MR 556A1 - Closer Look and First Impressions Report

I broke out the studio lighting to get this video offering a detailed look at the HK 556. Below the video are some of my thoughts at this point about the HK 556.

[video=youtube_share;kfTHNEP8gQs]http://youtu.be/kfTHNEP8gQs[/video]

Is there a noticeable difference between a piston driven system and a gas direct impingement system?

I guess it all depends on how you measure “noticeable.” I do notice a diference, but it is subtle. It is rather hard to articulate the subtlety of the difference, but there is something that feels a bit more “solid” about the HK when shooting it. Again, nothing too terribly different, but a difference, to be sure. Not sure it would push you one way or the other in terms of making a buying decision. The price point of the HK MR556 is to astronomically higher than any other “regular” AR, I don’t think one could argue that the “feel” alone would be the tipping factor.

Fit, finish, quality of the HK MR556.

As one would expect from an HK product, this thing is, as I mention on the video, built like a tank. It is extremely solid feeling, and heavy duty. The weight alone is a clue to its build quality. A heavier barrel and rail system, contribute to a rifle that, in comparison to other ARs, would certainly never be referred to as “light weight.” The fit and finish is superb. For the price, it better be.

Negative features.

The fact that you have to use tools to take the rifle apart will be, for many people, a major negative on this rifle. Then again, given the fact that with a gas piston system, a field strip is arguably not required as frequently may offset this. I have seen a video on YouTube showing a guy pushing the retention pins out with a standard 5.56 NATO round, using the bullet. I’ve not tried that. In order to get to the gas piston to clean it, you have to unscrew the entire rail assembly and take it off. No biggie, but again, given how the M1 Garand can be completely field stripped, even detailed stripped, without a tool, it would have been nice for this to have been a feature on the HK 416 / MR556 platform. Another thing about the MR556 that may be a turn off is the weight. It is not a light-weight AR. No two ways about it. Throw optics and other doo-dads on it and you are talking about a noticeably heavier carbine system.

Positive Features

The HK MR556 has a very solid bolt carrier group, heavier buffer, perhaps a stiffer buffer tube spring, but it lends the MR556 a very solid feeling and very positive round chambering quality. One of the first thing that everyone notices when they look it over is how strongly the bolt action operates. The iron sights on the HK are something you either love, or hate. I’m getting used to them. The trigger, out of the box, on the HK MR556 is very, very good. I really do not see a practical point in replacing the trigger with something else.

Just some thoughts…

The HK416 has been in use for near a decade… nothing new here.

Heavier does certainly not equal build quality, simply amount of metal used. Especially in HK’s case where they have switched to cheaper steels and/or screwed up the heat treating on their larger contracts and civilian variants.

At 9.1lbs (holy crap I have lighter 7.62x51’s) I doubt one would be able to tell the substantial difference between recoil characteristics of a DI vs piston.

I have found numerous HK’s to have a typical m4-ish sloppy upper and lower fit… nothing uber tight ala Larue OBR.

As with many military derived firearms, one does not need tool to take it apart. The bolt lugs are designed to fit into the handguard retaining nut…

" As with many military derived firearms, one does not need tool to take it apart. The bolt lugs are designed to fit into the handguard retaining nut… "

Are you referring to the MR 556A1 or to the 416?

Nice video, cool to see it up close. I don’t really think many seriously consider this for a personal carbine because it’s so cost prohibitive combined with plenty of undesirable features (like how it weights 9 pounds naked)

Yes.

C4

I remember going to my LGS, cash in hand, ready to buy one of the first one of these that arrived. I left without it. Ridiculously high mass weight, tools required to get inside, creeeeeepy trigger and no way to replace with a Geissele at the time (due to the FP safety in the BCG), issues with earlier gen PMAGS, and did I mention, ridiculously high mass weight?

By the time you recce the thing out you’re looking at ~14 lbs. No thank you.