Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
“The controversial city ordinance, which would also ban bump stocks and high-capacity magazines, passed unanimously on its first reading,*according to the Denver Post.”
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
purely cosmetic features, such as pistol grips, adjustable stocks, flash suppressors, bayonet mounds, and high-capacity magazines, that put them in a category of their own. They include a large portion of the long-gun market.
hahaah cause holding and controlling the gun making it fit you etc… is purely cosmetic 
Is “faggots” too harsh?
It’ll pass and be upheld when challenged.
This may be just the beginning of a terrible trend thanks to Deerville.
Unless the courts decide to overturn them, like that will happen, unless it goes to the Supreme Court, and then still, who knows. Damn totalitarian scum.
That is what I am afraid of.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Don’t see how this can stand since Colorado had preemption laws.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
It’ll stand for the same reason that all the other laws like this do…Some activist judge will dance around the issue then declare it so. It could say “Boulder shall not make any assault weapons bans” in the Colorado constitution and this shit would almost certainly still hold up to a challenge.
This is the future of gun control in the US…
And the United States has a Constitution that says “…Shall Not Be Infringed”. Words mean nothing to activist judges.
This is what I have a hard time with…makes my blood boil. We have already had our right infringed by the 1934 NFA, GCA of 1968, 1986…and it keeps going and going.
Boulder, Colorado, an enclave of high dollar leftists who produce stoned slacker offspring, living off of trust funds. They show up here in New Mexico with their dreadlocks and knitted hats. Worthless bunch.
The judges treat the Bill of Rights like the Pirates’ Code from Pirates of the Caribbean: More like guidelines than actual rules. They make up exceptions with no basis in history or legal reality in order to interpret the Constitution, and in some cases, they use the Constitution against itself. Their rulings against semi-auto weapons have basically come down to the weapons not being protected by the Constitution because they just…aren’t.
What’s more ironic is that the left even ignores and violates their own interpretation of the 2nd Amendment! They are still adamant that the 2nd Amendment only applies to people serving in the military, and yet, servicemen are prohibited from keeping and bearing arms unless they are deployed or in training. Weapons are banned on military bases, any serviceman who carries a weapon off duty does so as a private citizen under civilian laws.
And supposedly one of the highest NFA item ownerships in the nation… There is a reason that the law has in it that NFA items are exempt and there is even a clause that if you are active in competitive shooting, you can keep them. I don’t think that applies for the mags though. A machine gun with 10 round mags… what fun. Not saying it is a good law boy any means, but it has to be one of the oddest AWBs in the running.
It should be thrown out based on previous decisions. But I don’t know how left the SCOCS looks now.
It is so bad with confiscations with out compensation, that it should be preliminarily injunctioned.
People say that even if it went to a popular vote, it would fail. I kind of doubt that.
CO has a lot of Libertarian that looks Progressive, but doesn’t go for all the silliness. More classical Liberal that 21st century progressive.
If this passes, Denver will be back at it.
Noticed you can keep them if you register and pay a fee
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
When the town of Granby, CO took on muffler shop owner Marvin Heemeyer he up-armored his bulldozer and destroyed the town hall as well as some buldings owned by various parties connected to the city government.
So when is this vaunted push back everyone keeps talking about? Because where I’m standing it sure looks like a lot of tough talk while simultaneously taking it right up the ***.
This trend will continue and nothing will be done in regards to pushing back against it, well unless you consider internet whining pushback.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Been saying this for some time.
My theory- words on a piece of paper aren’t enough to inspire people to risk everything. Until door-to-door confiscation becomes a reality, or an outright ban on all firearms is passed, people will bide their time.
I do hope that if someone does decide to push back, they direct their anger at the politicians rather than law enforcement.