Defense Review posted a story on the new SureFire 60rd and 100rd AR mags designed in a partnership with Jim Sullivan & Bob Waterfield. From the article it appears that Sullivan designed the M193 .55grain nato round as well as the original 20rd box magazine for the 5.56.
It may look retarded but if it works as advertised it’ll cost and weigh less than a drum magazine. That’s a clear winner in my book. Now, if we can only get them to make these mags for our favorite 308 battlerifles!
You could always remove the extra stuff from the rails of your carbine- spare flashlight, BUIS, vertical grip, grenade launcher, water filter, first aid kit, emergency MRE, spare Blackberry with expanded video & music library and back up IPod, the selection of specialized multi-tools…
What?- Don’t tell me none of you ninjas roll out with style
Why do you think they came out with a 60 rounder?? Swap & Drop!
Oh I can see the future -for some of you- man I just burnt my barrel up where can I get another! Sometimes you can have to much of a good thing -this is one of them!:rolleyes:
I just can’t notionalize how that design would work. But if it did work, that 60 would be quite practical. I agree with the hundo being a little retarded though.
Ugh, I’ll take a SAW over a IAR any day. Anyone who’s spent a lot of time (or ANY time for that matter) as a dismounted machine gunner will know you’re in the prone usually when you’re at a halt, and especially when you’re in contact. I have a hard time seeing anyone use the 100 round mag for anything other than at a guard position or mounted in a truck, both of which aren’t what the IAR were designed for. Also the MSRP for the 60 rounder $129 and $179 for the 100. Yikes.
Maybe I’m old fashioned but mag fed support weapons scream FAIL.