Now perhaps this thread can get back on track! ![]()
Yeah it is a good deal but I think Grant is out too. The BCM blems are a wicked sweet deal.
Link 2. The mag catch was likely assembled improperly as OP was instructed to back it out 1 turn and didnât post that problem continued.
Link 3. The PMAG issue has been minor issue for lots of lowers. The issue usually doesnât occur with GI mags. If the issue doesnât occur with GI mags, is the lower out of spec or are the PMAGS?
As for the tight pins, Stickman says it pretty well,
The BCM blem lowers were in stock today.
I noticed no drop down menus for the S&W lower though.
Was there some when they were in stock?
Letâs stop this nonsense please.
We get it.
You like your RRA.
Youâre not gonna sell the idea to anyone else here.
Especially since you ignored link #1 regarding their CS.
Another deal breaker for most members.
Not sure. I liked the price and the lack of caliber markings on the S&W. Do you guys think that is why you need to be 21 to buy a lower w/o caliber markings because it could be a pistol.
The lower is fully assembled with a stock.
I thought that meant itâs a rifle.
![]()
Stripped I know for sure is âotherâ.
I donât know much on the subject though.
LOL, you got it wrong. I have LMTâs, Sabres, Stags, and RRAs. Iâm not trying to sell anyone on anything. The RRAs I have are toys, intended for NRA HP matches, nothing more. Simply stated the facts about their stripped lowers donât support the high numbers of out of spec stripped lowers conclusion. I didnât ignore link 1, it was a legit out of spec. I donât know both sides of that post, so other than it was out of spec, what is there to say. Links 2 and 3 were purported as out of spec lowers when they were assembly problems and magazine issues. Believe me, Iâve been on this forum long enough to know what it is about. It is about facts and statistics rather than emotions.