usmcvet, what’s your budget? Give me a hard $ ceiling…
In the $7K range, a John Andrewski/DLO Mk.4 Sterling, or a Vector UZI would be my first choices. The UZI will be more sustainable as far as parts, magazines, and they are easily suppressed. Also, if you up the rate of fire on an UZI with a recoil buffer, they actually become more controllable.
The Sterling, as well as the UZI, are legendary open bolt sub guns. The Sterling is by far the smoothest shooting out of the box of any open bolt sub gun. Low rate of fire, around 550-600 rpm. Not easy to mount optics on. The Sterling is also a fairly light weight open bolt sub gun, and is always a hit with both novice shooters as well as salty guys.
Both the Sterling and UZI have operated and continue to operate in just about every environment on earth, and do it well.
I’d personally avoid a STEN unless it’s either 1) a C&R GI bring back Mk.II or MK.V, or built by one of the well known and well thought of smiths on a good tube. Avoid the Mk.III’s.
The STEN was developed at a time when the invasion of Great Britain was a real possibility and they needed something that a bicycle factory could make. It’s a spring, a tube, and a prayer…
STEN magazines tend to need fitting to the gun, as there are millions and millions of STEN mags produced, and they tend to not be consistent.
If you want to get into a sub gun for around $4K or there about, then definitely go with a MAC-10 manufactured in the original Powder Springs GA facility (if you want old school), or a SWD M11-9 and get upgrades on it from Lage for a more modern open bolt.
I’ll be MORE than happy to help you spend money. :big_boss:
Novice shooter with my Sterling Mk.4 in semi auto engaging steel @ 30 yards.
VERY novice shooter getting her first taste of full auto fun.
Trigger control/bursts on the Sterling






