Been trying to learn to speak FAL. Would a Springfield 4800 be a better
rifle choice over a DSA gun if the price were right? Is a 4800 still the same as
a 48? And what about support since SA does not import these anymore?
I really am interested in still finding the original chrome lined barrel. I am
correct that the SA 4800 is chrome-lined right? Thanks guys.
The SAR-4800 is a post ban version of the SAR-48. Yes, they have a chrome lined barrel.
The only support you’d get from Springfield if anything went wrong is a credit towards purchasing one of their M1A’s.
If you wanted a standard pistol grip and buttstock with flash suppressor, you’d need to unban the SAR-4800 with the appropriate amount of US parts to make it a US made rifle (technically).
I would have to know the condition of the SAR-4800 to be able to compare anything.
If you take a look at Buck’s thread, the SAR-48’s were caught in Customs. They had to remove the “bad” parts and put the thumhole stock on. The purpose built SAR-4800’s that were brought in after '89, before '94 were marked 4800 on the upper (serialized part) and the lower they just used parts that had been marked from the previous model.
The receiver is marked SAR-4800 though. I’d really like to see a pic.
It’s very possible that the owner installed one of Springfield’s “Accurizing Kits” that they sold for their SAR-4800’s and SAR-8’s. I did the same to a Springfield SAR 3/8 overstamp way back in 1991 or so.
Yes my FAL Yoda… read it I did. Thats what turned me on to the SAR 48/4800.
But I did misss the last line about the accurizing kit. Got it now. Thanks again.