Civilian sailors on international voyages should be armed so that they can defend themselves, but that you and I shouldn’t be armed so that we can defend ourselves?
What a poopheaded wench.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
BTW- I knew that already.
ETA: BUT she and Boxer can have CCW’s in Kalifornia…
Just wait till the news breaks about her Husband’s company being awarded Multi Million Dollar FDIC Foreclosure contracts…
She sees NO conflict of interest…
At least it’s a start, if she actually did say this. The desire to see armed American civilians ANYWHERE is not something I would expect from her.
Reminds me of NPR’s anti-gun propaganda a couple weeks ago. In consecutive sentences they went from bashing gun owners, to saying that we’d have fewer hunters if rabbits had shotguns, back to saying people didn’t need guns to defend themselves. And not once recognized the fact that rabbits having shotguns = potential crime victims having guns.
So… Feinstein Thinks…
… with her ASS? :mad:
Sorry - my bad. I thought this was “fill-in-the-blank.”
Why on Earth would that news be made public?
That would potentially create a situation wherein negative attention would be focused on a democrat.
You don’t really expect that to happen, do you?
Yep, yet she is armed herself and has body guards!
" so Fienstein thinks"
Isnt that an oxymoron? Or did you mean to say “stinks”?
What a silly bitch…