This is the extreme of the variance found within a single box of RA40T. I found three different bullets. Most deviated toward the thin hollow cavity wall type. A few had thick walls. Maybe 10 had the extreme thick walls. Maybe this explains why some penetrate deeper than others and why some expand more and penetrate less.
I havn’t looked into the Rangers,but my brother showed up today with some 9mm HST’s. I noticed a rather pronounced difference in the appearance of the HP cavity.The ones he had seemed to have more of a taper in the hollow point and it didn’t look as deep to the naked eye as the ones I have been getting. Both were 147 gr.
I have a load coming in Monday UPS. I don’t know quite what to make of the change and am wondering if some re-testing would be in order. Maybe DocGKR can provide some insight.
I wish everyone would leave well enough alone.
The ammo (HST) came today. I checked a lot of the boxes.
What I have is boxes that are mixed with the nose style I have been accustomed to along with what appears to be a bunch with the shallower HP caviity. Both styles in the same box.
The newer ones also appear to be more circumferentially rounded at the nose. Definitely a change. I think some testing is in order to see if this slight change makes a difference in the performance characteristics,either negatively or positively.
Maybe I’m too fussy,but that’s just me.
Ditto on the Sabers.I saw that a few years ago myself. Perhaps I’m a little too OCD about it.Every time see a similar change I can’t help but think of DocGKR’s comment about some of the .45 Rangers being hit with dull punches,causing expansion problems.
I’ve experienced that too.Maybe I need to take a chill pill. Inconsequential increments? Probably so.