Okay, so here’s the deal. I’m looking to purchase my first AR in the near future. After procrastination for over a year, I finally decided to start looking into it. At first, I had my heart set on just getting a Colt 16” AR in an attempt to mirror the rifle I had while in the Corps. I chose a 16” barrel length after being dissatisfied with the accuracy of the 14.5in M4 on the rifle range out at 500yards, and from not liking the cumbersomeness and weight of a full 20” infantry rifle length. Also, after doing some research, I found out that 62gr ball fired from a 14.5in barrel will lose effective velocity to properly fragment and shred its target before it even gets to 100m. So, a 16” mid-length is my choice.
Now, as for the brand of rifle, that is what I have found myself very open to. I would like to get a Colt quality rifle without the Colt price tag. So I’ve been doing some reading here on the internet for the last month, as well as consulting my Uncle who just so happens to be a gun nut who has built many match grade AR rifles. All in all, I’ve decided to build an AR. Being my first, I want to buy a complete flattop upper, and build my lower.
Here is what I’ve been looking at:
BCM 16” mid-length upper - http://www.bravocompanyusa.com/BCM-BFH-16-Mid-Length-Upper-Receiver-Group-p/bcm-urg-mid-16%20bfh.htm - $475
BCM BCG and Standard Charging handle - $135
Spikes Mil Spec stripped lower - http://www.spikestactical.com/z/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=104_65&products_id=170 - $99
Daniel Defense LPK w/ MOE trigger guard - http://dsgarms.com/ProductInfo/DD-05-013-21007.aspx - $70
MOE mid-length handguard - http://store.magpul.com/product/MAG418/122 - $34
I already have a BUIS designed for use with an M4 that I’m sure will work just fine with the 16” barrel. I prefer ironsights anyway.
As for the buttstock, I was thinking of getting an M16 buttstock. One that came off of the original M16s (not the M16A1, but THE M16. You know, the one that didn’t work so well). After going through a Tactical shooting course, I found that stock to have the perfect pull for me. Which is great because I prefer fixed stocks to adjustable. But if I did go the adjustable route, I was impressed with the Magpul CTR mil spec adjustable stocks.
Anyway, only problem with that stock is that I cant seem to find where I could buy one.
Well, that is what I’ve been tossing around in my mind as far as my build. My goal is to build a reliable, accurate battle rifle on a budget (total cost is looking around $900-1000). One that I can shoot a CQB course with, as well as take to the range and get consistent tight groups at 300m. And have it for one of those just-in-case times at home.
Now, here’s the kicker. I’ve only chosen BCM, Spikes, and DD LPK after reading about how great they are on various internet forums and from various customer reviews. Now, call me crazy, but I’m always skeptical about things that are unanimously talked up as being God-teir. My uncle has been building quality AR rifles for over 30 years and has never even heard of BCM. Now granted they are a newer company, it makes me even more skeptical. The last time I bought a product from a relatively new company that was highly recommended and had a good price, I ended up having a pressure plate go out on a Stage III clutch after only 8000 miles.
So what I’m really looking for is any reason I SHOULDN’T go with BCM, Spikes, and DD. Any nay-sayers out there are welcome, and any links to forums or customer reviews saying nasty things about them are much appreciated.
TL;DR – I want to build an AR with a BCM upper, a Spikes stripped lower, and a Daniel Defense LPK. I would like to hear any reason why these are bad choices.