Product review – VG6 Precision Gamma 556

I saw this brake some time back and saw a couple of reviews on it. There wasn’t much on this site, so I decided to give it a try and be the guinea pig for it, seeing if it would be worth using over a PWS FSC556. I wasn’t overly fond of the length of the PWS and the Rainier Arms RMC being quite loud as well as the fireball it produces. And being a cheap sonofagun, I wasn’t willing to shell out for the Battlecomp. Anyway, overall impressions:

Materials used: Made of 17-4PH heat treated stainless steel with a black nitride finish. There really shouldn’t ever be a problem with corrosion on this between the nitriding and stainless steel.

Size: Equal to a standard A2 flash suppressor. There are no places on this brake to pin to a barrel and the OAL will prohibit it from bringing a 14.5 to a legal length unless it’s being used on an SBR.

Workmanship: The manufacturing quality was outstanding. No obvious tool marks were visible and the device had undergone a black nitride finish closely matching the color on the DD upper and rails.

Installation: The Gamma went on just like any other muzzle device and I was able to use a standard armorer’s wrench to tighten it down. However, upon installation, I had to use two small shims to get the device timed right. Otherwise, it threaded and torqued on easy enough to hand tight standard. I used the included crush washer and PWS shims.

It was installed on a factory Daniel Defense M4V3. Firing was undertaken with CBC (Magtech) M193 55 grain (100 rounds), Winchester RA556B 62 grain (30 rounds) and Mk 311, Mod 0 frangible (50 rounds). Buffer was an H2 and a Springco Blue action spring was installed. While not a major test, it did give me enough of a feel to compare it to other brakes I’ve used before. And I wanted to use full power loads as opposed to lower powered .223.

Shooting impressions: Well, kind of left me with a “meh” feeling which I’ll outline below.

Muzzle climb: While muzzle climb was tamed for the most part, the recoil still made the rifle jump off target. I was expecting to have more of the recoil tamed, but there was still a sharp jolt as compared to a gentle push. It seemed to do better with a standing unsupported position, but from a bench rest position, there was a lot more felt recoil.

Sound increase: Unknown since I was shooting indoors, but there only appeared to be a minor increase in sound. I also had someone blasting a .30-06 a couple of points down, so it was hard to distinguish at times.

Muzzle blast: Was fairly significant even in an indoor range. Plenty of sparks and fireballs were seen and could be a significant problem at night. And there was a noticeable concussion. Whether or not it was because I was indoors remains to be seen as I was on the last firing point and against a concrete wall. Being outdoors could maybe help this, I’m not sure.

Felt recoil: As stated, there was more than I should have been expecting for a “brake.” The PWS I’ve used before seemed to take away most of the recoil, far more than the Gamma. And the Rainier Arms RMC gives just about the same braking ability as the Gamma.

What I like: For me, the A2 is about the perfect size of comp/brake. I’m not overly fond of the lengthier PWS so the OAL of the Gamma was what I liked. I thought the workmanship was spot on.

What I don’t like: The obvious installation issue in having to use shims was something I’m not comfortable with, especially if the brake wasn’t shipped with them. However, it is something VG6 should take a look at in the manufacturing process to remove this minor annoyance in the future. I suppose I’m picky, but I expect most muzzle devices to go on and time correctly with just a crush washer unless it specifies to use shims. Minor adjustments to the settings in the manufacturing process could alleviate this problem.

Additionally, I was expecting a lot more braking action as opposed to a standard A2 especially with two chambers. The sharp jolt was not something that would be an issue in the long run, but was something that was noticeable and not expected.

Parting thoughts: Overall, there really isn’t anything special so far with this brake and nothing game changing. I need more time to give it a more thorough evaluation, but for the moment, I probably won’t be buying another yet. It is another alternative to other items on the market right now, but whether it is better than others? I plan on keeping this on my DD for the moment unless the sharp recoil starts affecting the accuracy (which it hasn’t so far) but will keep my eyes out for something else. I will probably end up doing a side by side test with the same ammo and lot with the BCM Gunfighter Comp in the near future, but for now, I’m not convinced this is better than other brakes on the market.

Great review. Thank you for the input and informative info.

Nice write up. Curious about the shims… Did it bottom-out using just the crush washer?

ETA: Just noticed this thread is a thousand years old :rolleyes:

Ive been using this brake for a long while now on an LMT Defender carbine. This, along with playing with buffer weight, dramatically reduced muzzle rise, and felt recoil. I mean, noticeably. I give a shit about muzzle blast/decibel increase…BUT…have not noticed anything dramatic with either at all. Don’t shoot AR indoors…but have not noted sparks, or added flame out the front.
The brake installed with no problems, and timed perfectly.
Best money Ive spent on an aftermarket part yet. Of course, I don’t have the time/money nor inclination to try to test a bunch more brakes…may be better or worse out there, don’t care.
Sorry your results don’t match mine, but this again, proves you gotta test EVERYTHING you add to any weapon and not just rely on others peoples results, or product advertisements.
EDIT: Just went back and pulled up a video on my phone from last winter, of my girlfriend shooting my LMT. Gloomy, very overcast wintery day. Absolutely NO flash, sparks or fire of any kind can be seen coming out of rifle. and I was zoomed in, standing very close with a clear view of the brake.
EDIT EDIT: JUST seeing this is a very old post…damn.

Yes, if I recall correctly, it was at about the 3 o’clock position with just the washer.

I’m glad others have had different experiences with theirs. Since that time, I’ve sold/traded off the DD and returned it to factory condition by putting the A2 device back on before doing so. I tossed the VG6 into the parts drawer and haven’t messed around with it since. I might take it back out since I’ve got a hankering for another build as of late to see if the timing changes.

http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2015/04/jeremy-s/ar-15-muzzle-brake-shootout-2/

This guys testing shows the VG6 Gamma reduces recoil 8% better than the PWS (and all relative to a bare muzzle)… which realistically means they are the about same. Note the VG6 Epsilon was installed backwards and should be similar to the Gamma.

I use the Epsilon and have no issues with crush washers. If it started at 3 o’clock, why not try another crush washer?

I installed a Gamma last night and noticed that I’d need about 120 deg of crush to time it correctly. With heavy lubrication on the crush washer, it timed correctly without any issues. Be sure you’ve lubricated the washer, threads and back end of the device if you’re having problems getting everything lined up.

I run the VG6 Epsilon on mine with the CAGE device since most of my shooting is at an indoor range. Without the CAGE it shoots completely flat, with the CAGE its got a VERY slight bit of muzzle rise (probably still less then other brakes) but the side blast is noticeably cut down.

That being said, I did not know there was an art to installing a brake. I just put the washer on, screwed on the brake until it was hand tight, took my wrench and tightened it super tight a half rotation until it was lined up perfectly

My son has one on his rifle. It works well for him but I don’t like standing beside him when his blast shield is off. I’ve felt worse but it’s annoying.

Here is another alternative to using crush washers and shims on non suppressor mount muzzle devices : http://armageddontactical.com/products/crush-washer-for-1-2-barrel-threads-pack-of-5-17-4-stainless-steel-machined-finish

I happened to come across this thread while looking at brakes and had to laugh a little. Not being an ass but OP I’m surprised by your review (which was done very well btw and maybe the product has changed since you wrote your review). I have the VG6 Gamma 556 extended on a 16" carbine and another VG6 Gamma on a AR10/LR308 18" 308. I also have the PWS FSC556 pinned on a 14.5" BCM carbine (BCM offers it pinned on their 14.5" bbl’s). The VG6 Gamma 556 extended has a pin hole to reach over 16" on a 14.5" bbl. With the VG6, I had no issues using the crush washer and timing both perfectly - yes, I had to use some force but it’s a crush washer (put uppers in a vise). If you didn’t use a vise that likely is why you had issues. I first installed the one on the 308 and was floored at how the recoil and muzzle jump was tamed - that’s why I bought one for the 16" 5.56 (the extended one). True, not the exact same one you used but nearly. I discovered the VG6 the same way as mentioned above - TTAG muzzle brake tests. The VG6 was one of the best performing brakes with the PWS not far behind (I tried the best overall, the Precision Armament M4-72 on a 16" bbl but it blows a blast of air back into my face each time I fire as the brake’s chambers cant backwards - no thanks). So again, nice write up but I too have had VERY different experiences with the VG6 Gamma that were much better than yours (I’m shopping for another one right now to replace the Precision Armament one). I also REALLY like the PWS FSC556 (as much as the VG6 Gamma) but it’s about $30 more - the VG6 Gamma goes for about $65 and the PWS FSC about $95 (although I just found one on sale for $80 + $8 shipping through Valhalla). Maybe the extended one performs differently but the short one was used in TTAG’s tests - absolutely NO “meh” on my part but a lot of HELL YEAH! Anyway, my 2 cents.