Yeah I am sure the Elementary school they were picketing in front of sure got that point. Kids really need to see that shit.
Because kids aren’t continually exposed to filth on screens small and large…
If you want your children to looks at pictures of obliterated and decapitated babies, that’s on you man. Whatever gets you off. I think it’s complete bullshit they are allowed to picket wherever they want, with whatever horrible pictures they want. There are much better way of relaying your point than with a big 'ol sign with bloody baby parts.
Let’s strip people of their 1A rights too.
Because that’s what I said.
With comments I just read on here it is clear that culturally the first amendment is dead.
“The 2nd amendment is necessary to defend the 1st!” we say. Notice that there was no defense of it with the 2nd as we like to pine all the time, thumping our chest.
Too bad there’s 57 million AMERICAN babies since 1973, who would probably disagree with you on that point. I wish THEY hadn’t been chopped into small parts… 
Meaning directly I am against every single form of abortion except incest, rape (provided a rape kit be done, and confirm that is what happened) and if the pregnancy going to term will kill the Mother. Those are the only forms I am remotely okay with.
For the life of the mother, not the ‘mental health’ of the mother. I’d be a bit more lenient if people got pregnant thru airborne route. You had your fun, Darwin has to be paid, here’s your kid.
I agree. It’s not a form of birth control.
LOL… like a punishment?
Are you for real?
That material is NOT “hate speech” sorry.
No he’s not. He fully supports cutting up babies into à la carte items for “research.”
How is it punishment if it’s her own kid? Spreading one’s legs for a man and or copulating with a woman does come with a price, there is more than one out there lol.
I’m old enough to remember when "Birth Control " pills were rather new and very controversial, back in the late 60 to early 70’s there were more than a few couples in their late 40’s and early 50’s with “change of life babies” and more than a few of these children were “special needs”. Your wife goes in to menopause, your first two kids are in college and what don’t you know, you’re 53 and going to be a Father again.
The really scary part is that there are some pretty good chances that pregnancy is going to be risky and so are the chances that the baby will be born with some serious complications.
I’m not trying to hand out a hall pass to anyone, but some of life’s choices and circumstances can try your soul.
And, not too damn surprising, most people agree with you - I know I do. Being kind of pragmatic, the choice the choice boils down to is it better to compromise a bit today and save a couple ten’s of thousands unborn babies, or stand your ground and doom them to die, because you alienate a good percentage of the folks who side with you in principle, but can’t stand the rhetoric?
I’ve often heard ‘no compromise’ in terms of many things, but in reality it ought to be ‘no compromise, without some progress to our end goal.’
It truly is a tricky topic with no clear correct answer, and not every situation is the same. I am blessed with people I personally know that brag about getting abortions, and don’t you dare tell them differently.
I understand what you are saying, but that is the past, not the present. In today’s world, there is little or no reason for abortion strictly for birth control. Men can get clipped, women can use anything from shots, to IUD’s, to birth control pills, to have safe sex with out the danger of an unwanted pregnancy.
There is a single-parent family in my community that has three children with a myriad of disabilities ranging from severe vision impairment to diabetes and kidney failure. These are the results of a genetic disorder, which, I’m told was identified after the first child was born.
When I first heard of this I remarked to my wife 'Why the hell do you have another kid when you know this is a distinct possibility? And after kid number two, why do you have kid number three? (please spare the free-stuff-state comments) My very, very, pro-life wife said, ‘I don’t know, why don’t you ask the youngest one what he thinks?’ Ouch. Touche.
Jealous.
Most girls I’ve dated support post-birth abortion.
Me: “I’m so glad there have been 57 million abortions of Democrats since the 70s. What about you babe?”
Hottie with a body: “Ugh, why does everything have to be about politics with you? I’m glad that women have freedom to choose.”
Me: “Do the women babies get to choose to live?”
Hottie with a body: “You mean the clump of cells wreaking havoc on a real woman’s body? No. They don’t.”
Me: “Come over here and get on your knees”
Hottie with a body: “alrigghhhttt”
One day I’m going to record a typical convo with these types and post it up here. Maybe I’ll do that tonight. I’m bored.
Edit: On second thought, I’m not sure the mods would allow it…
That is an understatement. Of course, if they truly believe that their actions were correct, then you won’t convince them otherwise, and they’ll resent you; if at some level they believe they are wrong, they aren’t likely to admit it, and will vehemently defend their choice, or, at the least resent you for telling them of their error.
Hard to win, hard to know what to do.