Why are we spending a billion dollars to build a new embassy in a country that is committing generational suicide via muslim immigration? Seriously, I hope we can get some of the cost back by selling the land in Mayfair.
I agree with your opinion… I have a low opinion of the UK govt right now because they have banned Michael Savage. The UK of today will be us in 10 years if we don’t reign in the socialists.
I’m guessing the “high security” bit of the embassy is going to contribute significantly to the overall pricetag. Generally when using capital funds the price of everything from construction to computers that will be in the building get lumped together on the price tag.
…and the UK is our best ally on the planet. Apart from that bit of unpleasantness in the late 18th century, we’ve generally been on the same side of things in the world.
Why don’t they sell (or renovate) Winfield House, the Ambassador’s enormous 12 acre estate in London, instead of building this monstrosity? I mean, it’s only the second largest property in London after Buckingham Palace.:rolleyes:
Exactly. We’ve had that property for a long time and it’s worth a FORTUNE. I realize that the Ambassador has to entertain dignitaries and such, but good Lord - that house is over the top.
I’m going to bet it’s no more secure than 10 downing st. And I know they haven’t spent a billion in the last 10 years. The SIS building would run around $500mil today if you add inflation.
Building a billion dollar embassy anywhere, at least until we don’t have a $12,000,000,000,000+ debt, is absolute lunacy. Which is, sad to say, par for the course.
Perhaps I spoke too soon…I knew I had heard something about it being lifted but I guess they changed their minds…