Ok Guys,
So I’m really thinking of buying an M1A (my first), and I want one of the new Springfield versions. I don’t have the bling for collecting old relics, and I want something new, and tactical.
I was thinking first about the Socom 16, but then I saw the 18" Scout Squad, and thought the extra barrel length might be better, with a 7.62 round.
OR, I could just go full length and buy the 22" M1A also with black synthetic, tactical stock.
This is going to be an all purpose tactical rifle, and I already own an M4 with an ACOG. I will NOT be putting an Aimpoint or Eotech or any other red dot sight on this M1A. I MIGHT consider another ACOG, but in all honesty, I feel the M1A deserves a real scope, with higher magnification than any ACOG has.
Does anyone else feel this way?
Still though, I LOVE the look of short carbines and short barrels, and while I think the Socom 16 looks the best, I also feel the 22" is a bit long.
That’s why I’m currently leaning towards the 18" Scout Squad.
SO, the ONLY thing I really need to know more about, is the performance differences of the rifle with the different bbl lengths.
I mean, am I giving up a lot of performance if I go with the 16" Socom? How about the 18"?
Is the 18" bbl going to be THAT much different in performance, than the 22" would be?
Keep in mind that my BIGGEST concern is accuracy. While I AM interested in the varied knock down power and muzzle energy/etc with the different bbl lengths, I am even MORE interested to know how much accuracy difference will there be, between these different bbl lengths???
Can anyone give me some approximate numbers on what kind of accuracy these three rifles are capable of, at 100 and 300 yds??? IF I just knew the accuracy of the three bbl lengths at these two distances, I could probably make my decision right away. (ok, almost!)
Thanks so much for any help guys.



