OK guys, just need some input. I have a complete LaRue lower in need of a new upper. I’ve narrowed it down to a BCM EAG upper or a KAC SR-15 E3/IWS upper. I want a lightweight, reliable training upper that will be used mainly for training classes. Both are spec’d well and would fit into the role I want. Mainly trying to decide if I want to take on the proprietary parts the KAC or go with the standard middy setup of the BCM.
Well I say KAC If you can afford it. Price is the biggest factor for me. If you can afford KAC get KAC in my opnion.
What ICAN said.
As an SR15 owner I have to go with the KAC, nothing wrong with BCM from what I have heard but I just dont have one so cant say much about them. KAC customer service is excellent too.
I too would go with KAC. On the BCM EAG you will have a pinned FH (unless you have the paperwork). I would rather be able to run whatever FH or Brake I wanted on it.
BCM would be my choice for stated purpose.
First, for training upper I don’t see a point of paying extra, especially if less expensive alternative is an excellent one.
Second, training uppers are usually fed training ammo, quality of which is now very variable. KAC traditionally was set up for milspec ammo and there are enough reported instances of KAC not running on less hot civilian training ammo. My two BCMs, on the other hand, eat everything. It should be noted that KAC apparently has opened gas ports on their barrels, but I don’t know if this is now a standard for them. Also, you wouldn’t know if the upper you’re about to buy has smaller or larger port, unless there is a way of figuring when it was made and checking with KAC.
Third, the proprietary parts are not a big deal, IMO; the question is what they offer over regular parts. My understanding is that KAC guarantees their bolts to 20K rounds and some folks run them much longer. However, BCM (mostly from reports from EAG classes) have shown excellent durability, with bolt life up to 16K. Since it is a training upper with catastrophic bolt failure being not a big problem, you can run it all the way until it breaks, without preventative replacement. From that angle, BCM with cheaper replacement parts will likely be more cost-effective in a long run as well.
Gee these are some great points to
I would say KAC, but I have become biased after 3 years. Early ones did have issues with smaller gas ports & requiring hotter, mil-spec ammo. That hasn’t been an issue for quite some time now. If you pick up a new upper today, especially from Lawmen’s, it shouldn’t be a concern. My most recent E3 upper was purchased over a year ago and it has run reliably with weak Centurion ammo that used to give me issues with my original E3. My newest one eats everything I have fed it. At a street price between $1200-$1300, including buis, bcg and rail covers, its worth every penny.
Sent from my Droid using Tapatalk
If I go with the KAC it will come straight from them so I’m not too worried about the gas tube. The KAC sure seems to be what I am looking for…damn decisions…
I would go with the KAC. Knight’s makes excellent products.
Granted their upper is somewhat proprietary due to different bolt design and mid length style gas system but how often have you heard their upper having a malfunction or breakage of some sorts?
I have shot Knight’s rifles and would not hesitate to recommend and use their product.
You mentioned weight as one of your factors. The SR15 will fill that bill quite nicely. I’m not sure what the EAG upper would weigh.
Also, I wouldn’t be overly concerned with proprietary parts. Last time I asked, KAC had not had a single case of a commercial SR15 breaking a bolt, not so much as a sheared lug. Hence, their 20K round guaranty. They must be doing something right with that design. There are some guys around here with many more rounds through their SR15’s than I have put through mine and I’ve never seen a single report of a parts failure of any of the “proprietary” parts.
how much difference in price are we talking about?
From readily available sources, BCM is 1175, KAC is 1500. I’ve not seen KACs for 1200-1300 as somebody stated above, but I haven’t really looked. BCM comes with 100 bucks certificate towards a EAG class.
There was one in the EE last week, new & unfired for $1200 and I know Lawmens had them on sale for $1300. MSRP for the upper is $1450.
Sent from my Droid using Tapatalk
For this discussion, let’s assume they cost the same amount. I’m not worried about the price difference, just want the best performance.
KAC…My SR15 is the only 5.56 gun I’ve ever still been interested in after owning a while. I tend to go through different setups, and they come and go for me.
The BCM EAG is a nice gun but the SR15 is that much better. You aren’t talking about a huge price difference either, and I think the price difference is easily justified. The URX rail has more features than LaRue, you’re getting a much improved bolt design with 20k round warranty, a better barrel profile for weight and speed, little bit longer gas system length for low recoil and smoothness in operation, and my opinion but nicer iron sights as well. Plus you are not going to have to deal with a pinned muzzle device if you ever are in the market for a can.
The gas port sizing had to do with people running weak ammo in the winter. Mine has done fine with every type of ammo I’ve run through it including steel case stuff even after extended periods of no cleaning and just adding more lube.
Good, solid info from all. Thanks. I think I’ll be ordering the SR15 upper this afternoon!
It’s a tough call between two great guns. The SR15 may have a slight weight advantage & I would expect similar reliability between the two. However, I prefer the urx rail and the pinned FH on the BCM is a non starter for me. You really have to handle an SR15 to fully appreciate it.
ETA- bkb summed it up pretty well
Best way to tackle this is to look at the pros and cons of each comparing your stated criterion; weight and reliability. I’ll also through out there that longevity, accuracy, and overall cost are probably factors as well. Define each criteria:
Weight - mass (kinda of a no brainer there).
Reliability - the probability that the rifle will fire when the trigger is pulled.
Longevity - length of service life (not the same as reliability, although related).
Accuracy - you’ll need to define your accepted level of accuracy but my guess is this is pretty much a wash between the two.
Overall cost - this goes beyond initial purchase price, but should shold also include what it takes to run the gun (think of it like a car, gas, tires, parts replacement). Can you run cheap training ammo reliably? In the “unlikely” event that there’s a parts failure, how quickly and affordably can you get the gun back up and running.
Both BCM and KAC make high quality rifles and components. If you’re using quality mags and decent ammo, the next most common issue witht he AR platform is the bolt. If you’re going to break a bolt it’s going to be at a training class. If you don’t have a spare bolt, someone else may very well offer to loan you their back-up. The question is will it fit?
ICANHITHIMMAN mentioned the 20K round bolt guarantee from KAC. I’m sure this means that if your bolt fails witin 20K rounds they’ll replace it for free. Will they refund you the pro-rated cost of the training course you just had to drop out of because the bolt failed? The bolt may not be likely to fail, and you’d probably NEVER have an issue with it. However, if it’s going to fail, it’s going to occur during the course. So, make sure to have a back up bolt (for either upper you choose) and factor that into you overall cost.
However, your last post mentioned to assume cost is a wash and that you wanted the “best performer”. Both will be relatively light weight, very reliable, accurate, and should last a long time. In my opinion, I’d go with BCM. To me the parts commonality between my other rifles (and the rifles of others) is an important factor. Absolutely nothing against Knight’s, I’d love to have one. I just know that if anything short of the receiver breaks on any of my BCM rifles, I can quickly swap out parts as needed and even borrow parts from others if necessary.
Re: bolt failure
KAC has stated that a standard bolt will function in the E3 barrel extension. In a pinch, you could always drop in a standard bolt, but KAC does not recommend it for long term use.
Sent from my Droid using Tapatalk