Someone forwarded me this through email and thought I’d share it and would like to hear your thoughts on this.
i believe anything on the internet. i’m having another child asap.
41 and no kids. Guess I am failing the cause. 
looks like polygamy is the only way to save our race and religion. 
i’ve got 3 boys and a few more on the way. don’t blame me.
There have been many studies, articles, and books on this same subject. If you are a reader and have an interest pick up a copy of America Alone. It has a ton of history as well and will give you some insight on this topic. Scary stuff, but probably very true.
Are these numbers correct? Are the statistics correct? I don’t know, but the principle is certainly correct. Forget Islam for a minute and just look at Democrats vs Republicans in the US. The liberals will ultimately win. Why? Because they are outbreeding us. Not to get racist, but which groups have more children? You know who. And those groups are, overall, less educated, are lower in the socioeconomic order of things, and want the free handouts that the Dems provide. So with time, the percentage of “them” to “us” in the population will increase, which means the Dems will become ever more solidly entrenched. Which of course ultimately means adios to the 2nd Amendment.
Now apply this principle worldwide. As a general proposition, poorer and less educated people have more children. Of course they have to because they tend to live in places with higher infant mortality rates, but they also tend to be part of cultures which encourage large families and where birth control is not practiced. So I am prepared to believe the thesis of that video. The accuracy of the numbers merely determines how many years it will take for the scales to tip. But, sooner or later, the scales will tip.
Thomas Malthus discussed this 200 years ago. His thesis was basically that the world was going to run out of food because populations increase geometrically, but sustenance (food) can only increase arithmetically.
However, the problem has become people vs people, not people vs food. If we have two populations, one of them relatively affluent, educated, and otherwise prosperous, in which small families are the norm, and the other, relatively poor and uneducated, in which large families are encouraged and socially rewarded, the latter will outbreed the former and will, in time, come to be the dominant culture.
The bad news is, your great-great-great-granddaughter will wear a burqa. The good news is, you won’t be around to see it.
I’d say its an issue of “who’s having the most children, and the answer is social parasites”. If the Republicans started better handout programs tomorrow, the parasites would suddenly begin calling themselves Republicans. The tags themselves are meaningless.
The bad news is, your great-great-great-granddaughter will wear a burqa. The good news is, you won’t be around to see it.
I just sent the video, along with your quote to my friends/family. Good way of pointing it out.
Hope my grandkids start the NAAWP, and become an unending thorn in their side… :mad:
But wouldn’t the NAAWP be considered not politically correct? In other words, what some can do, others can’t? Reverse discrimination? Makes me sick! It’s about time we stood up for ourselves. But, if we do that, we are bad people. Is it wrong to be proud of the country our ideals built? Is it wrong to be proud of the acheivements of the white people? I DO NOT support discrimination. Period. But these days it seems to not be a two way street. But to stand up for ourselves is not politically correct.
Let me say this. I do not support hatred against any race/belief/culture/religion; period. I do not believe in slavery; period. It is wrong. I do not feel that being proud of our past makes me racist. I am not racist. I simply am proud to be white. I have several black friends and they are all aware of my feelings. They support me and have the same feelings of their own origins.
Judge a race/culture/religion by their actions and accomplishments. If they don’t behave in a civilized manner, then are they an equal?
This is silly. We are undergoing massive social and climate change and the planet is already over-populated. You can go and have 12 children if you wish but you’ll be just like the “you know whos” in poverty and destitution.
C’mon, guys…
so should i take my baby batter to the bank for people in my community that cant get it on their own? or should i have 2 more?
I personally think the larger, underlying problem is the increasing liberalization of these United States. I work with a bunch of left-leaning sheeple who are convinced that there are o such things as extremist mulsims and that we have no fear of the so-called “religion of peace”.
The funny thing is these supposed adults learned these “facts” from playing board games and ‘Warcraft’ and other such waste of time. None of these guys and gals have ever bothered to actully study who the hijackers of 9-11-01 were and what motivated them and any subsequent the suicide bomber/terrorist into killing innocent people. JM2CW.
You are correct, we are undergoing a massive social change, but that is not necessarily a good thing. Change is a bad thing just as often as it is a good thing. How have you come to the conclusion that the world is over populated? While it is true that there are many that starve too death, it has nothing to do with overpopulation per say or even not being able to produce enough food. It has more to do with distribution methods of food and mankind’s struggle for dominance over each other. As for your reference to climate change, the earth has always gotten warmer and cooler in cycles, regardless of what humans are doing. I fail to see what that has to do with anything.
That is because it is George Bushes fault;). In all seriousness, there are so many more examples than that for them to study.
I did not say that the social changes were positive. I think they are non-positive and are being nurtured by powerful personages within our societies (they are happening all over the planet).
As far as overpopulation is concerned go visit some of the major cities in the US. Then visit the major cities in the world. We are currently fighting for oil pipeline routes to control Japan, India & China. That would be the “wars on terror” that Obama Administration seems likely to continue in Afghanistan. Check out the books Resource Wars by Michael T. Klare as well as
Fuelling War: Natural Resources and Armed Conflicts by Philippe Le Billon. There are others as well but these two should suffice.
As far as climate change is concerned it matters not WHAT the causes are; the changes will effect crop growth and water supplies. And it matters not if it’s global COOLING or warming. We WILL fight for diminishing reserves no matter what they are. The beast must be fed.
Then there is the outright greed and dominance which shall drive much of this. He who controls food controls people; he who controls oil controls nations. He who controls both food and oil will decide who lives and who dies in the coming age of diminished reserves.
Things will “balance out” one way or another. It always does. As we move deeper into this Global Financial/Social/Security crisis we shall see a massive depopulation of the planet. There are many documents from influential persons who not only predict this but see it as a positive goal. I don’t see depopulation as a “positive” but I do believe there will be massive loss of lives one way or another.
I don’t see this as a white vs. black thing, nor even as an Anglo vs. Hispanic thing. To the extent that some see those as issues, I think they are pretty much limited to the USA.
As to your first comment (the increasing liberalization of these United States), you are spot on – insofar as the USA is concerned.
As to your second comment (extremist Muslims) – how many of you saw Children of the Taliban on Frontline last night? If you believe, as I do, that the hand that rocks the cradle rules the world, you will find that show to be really, really scary.
This isn’t about one race vs. another race. It is about ignorant (I did not say stupid) peasants who live like our forefathers did in Charlemagne’s time vs. the civilized West. 850 vs. 2009.
Guess who is outbreeding whom?
(Carlos, I miss your old avatar.)
You always manage some outlandish, baseless nonsense if given enough time. :rolleyes:
I sense you are a fairly intelligent man. Why do you discredit yourself in this way so often here?
Roll your eyes as much as you wish, Safetyhit; I suspect you’re not half as well-read on this subject as you believe yourself to be. It’s not an indictment of the entirety of this nation. It’s an indictment of the Elite and elements of Congress who DO know.
I have been to big cities here in the US, and big cities on 3 other continents, plus various islands, what is your point. As I stated in my last post, it is not a lack of resources, as much as it is the distribution system and the control over that system. It does not matter what you are talking about, whether it is food or oil there is far more of it out there than most realize. We have all been told how there is only a finite amount of oil, yet now there are wells that were once pumped dry that are now full again. We are not running out of oil to the extent that most believe. Food, there is a report that states that in 1999 the US,Canada& Mexico alone produced enough food to feed the planet (granted not at the amount that is average in the US). But that is just one continent, I believe that food grows in other places as well. It is all in how it is distributed.
You could, in fact should, have just left it at “WeWILLfight”. It does not matter if we had all the resources and everyone else knew it, we would turn around and fight over something important like how we are ruled or something stupid like skin color, or anything else we can think of.
You mean virtually all of this. As I always tell people that it is always about power above all else. They usually say " ya, that or money" and I say no still power. Some see money as power but others seek power in other ways. I will use some recent examples, take the Russian billionaire Mikhail Khodorkovsky, he was one of the wealthiest men in the world and had some power. But look at Vladimir Putin, he did not have the wealth that Mikhai had, but he had POWER. Who won that struggle. If you have money you have some power but maybe not enough, but if you have power you will have enough money.
True, why do you think that the myth of our LACK of resources is pushed so heavily.There is a trick that has been used in some version or another for century’s. It goes something like this. The King takes a very large portion of grain and stores it. A much larger portion than he should be taking. Then when the people find that they are short on grain and there is great fear, the King comes out and says that he will save the day and feed his people (with their own food) and most of the people will say " We love our King, isn’t he so great he feeds us and looks after us. We have a benevolent King." But it never lasts too terribly long before everything come crashing down and things start again
History tells us that this is true
The oligarchy.