MR556 10.5 or SCAR CQC

I am in the process of adopting a new patrol rifle and have narrowed it down to 2 choices. An HK MR556 or a L.E. SCAR CQC (Semi-auto) A few things to note about this rifle. At this point I am leaning toward the SCAR.

-It will be shot supressed almost all the time with AAC Mini4
-It needs to be really light and compact for use around/from a Crown Vic.
-At this time (and the forseeable future) it will be fed any brass cased ammo our agency can get a hold of.
-I like piston guns, including Markm’s renouned and constant recommendation of LWRC products. :stuck_out_tongue:

Another poll? :suicide:

I love my SCAR 17s, literally the only knock on the SCAR platform is the rail/handguard could be longer… Not an issue in a CQC version, not to mention foldable buttstock, I think that makes it vastly superior for your use.

That is a big plus for me. Having that on the ready on a felony stop instead of a damn handgun is a good move for me. Minus a light and IR, I dont need much rail.

SCAR.

Polls: https://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?t=131186

Not that the SCAR CQC has really been available to this point, but I would (and do) consider it to be the most desireable member of the SCAR family. If you’re going to look at a piston gun, it might as well be one designed for the system from the ground up, as opposed to yet another AR adaptation – even a very good one, like the HK.

AC

SCAR ftw.

SCAR is much lighter and the stock can be folded.

Well said AC.

-Jax

Haven’t shot an HK MR556, but I’m really happy with my SCAR 16 SBR, both suppressed and unsuppressed.

Grossly OT: “Rhino” is a Super Hornet, no?

AC

I don’t think the MR556 is meant to be a patrol rifle, full size or otherwise. Heavy profile match barrel cut down to 10.5" doesn’t seem like the best use of the rifle.

jmo

Can you buy a real HK416 instead of a MR556 as a LEO or will HK only do agency sales on those? If an MR556 is the only option on that front, I’d vote for the SCAR.

Correct.

Props, my man. I realize it is really a hard work/payoff sort of thing, but I still hope you manage to go to the flight deck every day feeling pretty blessed.

AC

My thoughts are this.

  1. What will it do for you, that a properly built DI gun will not do?

  2. Are you shooting F/A?

  3. Would it not be wiser to spend the additional money on a standard quality AR and use the additional money on magazines and other stuff?

  4. Who will support the weapon and pay for additional parts. Will you be able to get them? If so, what are the additional costs?

1.) I think with probably a 90% of the time running this system supressed I would see many benifits with a piston system. Especially on a 10 inch barrel gas to the face would be significantly reduced.

2.) Our Agency will issue Letter Heads for a full-auto purchase, but I do not see a benefit for it and I would want to keep this rifle if I ever left the Agency, so no.

3.) I have good DI guns, (Noveske and a 6920), and many mags.

4.) FNH always had amazing customer service when I was on the civilian side, and now that I’m a donut sucker, It has been even better. And while I do prefer to work on an AR, The SCAR is such an easy weapon to work on and maintain.

I think you just answered your own question.

:wink:

I’m going to side with the others and say SCAR.

The light weight, and folding stock seems like a great advantage when working around cars and stuff. However, I will say that on the SCAR sling points seem to be an afterthought, and I’d recommend using BlueForce Gear UWLs to mount a sling with it.

Also, factory CQC barrels should be available this year.

Also, ambi controls. Gieselle makes a trigger for it. (Instead of getting stuck with HK trigger parts.) And there’s aftermarket charging handles, and stock latches for it now.

I’d recommend it over a piston-AR.

We seem to have a real barn-burner on our hands here. Is anyone running the AAC Mini4 on anything shorter than a 14.5?