“The mid-length system is approximately half way between the carbine and rifle length gas systems, while maintaining the same barrel length as a carbine weapon. It was created for various reasons, primarily to increase gas pressure in an attempt to increase reliability of the carbine weapon. The U.S. military M193 and M855 spec ammunition does not generate enough pressure to cycle the carbine length system with 100% reliability in certain adverse conditions (this has been solved with high pressure loads like Mk262). So, the gas system was lengthened slightly on a carbine length weapon to generate more pressure to ensure reliable cycling.”
Midlength cures very fast cyclic rates, less gas pressure at the gas port with less port erosion, heavy duty extractor spring are needed. Heavier buffers aren’t required but many still run H buffers with them.
Carbine, to Mid-length, to Rifle length, correct, decrease , not increase, in gas pressure. The further out the gas port is on the barrel, the less pressure. Rifle being optimum, as designed. Middy’s solves the problems associated with the carbine. Where did you get that quote? TOS?
Either he miss wrote his post or he cant understand the graph he posted.
Just did a quick look over Nato ammo is loaded to higher pressure than .223.
LMT “Boutique” Brands WTF :rolleyes:
Big name brands
Rock River Arms
Bushmaster
Armalite
DPMS
Colt
other than colt all the others use shortcuts in manufacturing there arms IE they are cheaper.
This is the funniest Better still are receivers machined out of solid billet aluminum or steel. Solid steel :eek::rolleyes: only thing to be gained is weight.
no shit… i’m guessing the graph was added without understanding what it means. unless he seriously typeod “reduced” and “increased” like 5 times… doubtful.
carbines run 26k psi
midlengths run 19k psi
rifles run 13k psi
the midlength was originally created as a response to carbine problems which was found out to be the gas tube length. They moved the gas port up 2 inches without changing the barrel length
Could you please elaborate on why you mention that a heavy duty extractor spring is needed for a middy? I’m building a middy and will have a BCM full auto bcg with the heavy duty spring/insert and crane o-ring. Is this more of a requirement for the middy? Is this a typo? Wouldn’t the strong extractor and o-ring benefit ALL gas systems? I’m trying to understand this area better…
I only use o-rings on CAR gas systems. I’ve seen so many cause feed problems among other things in larger gas systems because the guns owner ‘overfixed’ a CAR problem on a midlength.
God, it’s like someone distilled all the stupid from TOS, Glocktalk, and THR into one place, and sweetened it with a touch of keltecforums.
Recoil
God’s Gunslinger
Administrator
Member In Good Standing
Offline Offline
Posts: 11406
WWW
Re: LMT Releasing a .308 MRP
« Reply #1 on: November 15, 2009, 01:03:16 PM »
$3,000 for a rifle that doesn’t shoot any better than a $1,100 DPMS, and locks you in to a proprietary barrel system, ensuring that for the rest of your life you have to buy overpriced barrels from LMT.
Better still are receivers machined out of solid billet aluminum or steel. Solid steel :eek::rolleyes: only thing to be gained is weight.