My buddy sent me a link to a $1,900 subwoofer and said, “I want this.” I recently started educating him on the in’s and out’s of the AR-15 (mostly with links to m4c threads) so he’s also been talking about wanting to get one. So I dutifully pulled up a $1900 Noveske, sent him the link and asked, “Do you still want to get that subwoofer?”
So is anyone able to enlighten me? Is it different than 4140 or 4150? Is there something out there that describes it and its differences? Or do only people with the TDP know?
I dont know specifics, but if you reason with the fact that it is for a SAW and not an M4, you can conclude that the SAW should have a higher standard.
Only those who have signed an NDA have access to the TDP, but the steel is 4150 or better. Reportedly, the substantially greater longevity of the barrel is in large part due to the chrome lining, which is twice as thick as that supplied in the M4/M16.
Well, that’s certainly true, but the double-thick chrome lining is mentioned separately, so my supposition is that the material used for the barrel is somehow different as well.
So, it could be reasonably assumed that it is a different type steel which is, in certain aspects, superior (at least for weapons like the SAW) to what might otherwise be used in an AR-15 carbine or rifle? [As opposed to the same type of steel but selected from batches which have fewer impurities or whatever–sort of like how they build sniper-grade or accurized weapons by selected especially accurate (but otherwise stock) components?]
Thanks for the info, Todd. I have a Light Recce Basic w/VIS on order, should be arriving here in Minnesota in the next week or two (fingers crossed). I’m anxious to get it on the bench, then I have a course with Sully end of July, a local course in September, and TriCon in October. In the process of stocking ammo now. Those three plus training ought to be good for about 5,000 rounds in the next few months.