i plan to buy anoth BCG for a backup,and wasnt sure if i should move some other items up on the priority list and give this some time to work itself out(if needed and its indeed a real issue).
i emailed LMT in regards to getting spare extractors and extractor springs for the enhanced bolt.
i got a reply back in six minutes, literally 6 minutes, not an exaggeration.
even tho mine was a very small order, you’d think i was placing a major government contract by the way it was handled.
knowing ARFCom, it very well might be a Armalite/Bushmaster/Colt (insert brand here) fanboy bashing a brand he doesn’t own. who knows? but it wouldn’t be the first time.
even if its not a hoax, it could be that he got a 6.8 or .204 bolt instead of a 5.56
if it really was a serious problem he would have called LMT instead of posting on the internet.
Bolts are HP-MP tested in the white, by hand ala fired by hammer, in a fixture. It would depend on the dimensions of the fixture. If passed moved on to the park line.
One time at Blackwater, there was this one enhanced bolt and carrier combo…
I got an enhanced LMT bolt a long while ago when it first came out. It would not work reliably in any gun I had, with any carrier combination, or buffer combination and using 55gr M193, XM193 and Q3131a…
Just wouldn’t work. LMT took it back and tested it. They told me that the enhanced bolt was designed to work with M855 62gr only, and that 55gr ammo was not up to spec. :eek:
I sold it to someone and explicitly told them what had been found by LMT. That person bought the bolt and used it to great effect with military spec M855.
FWIW, gs430 aka Mike C., is a very prolific internet bash artist. He tried riding ArmaLite for months and months over an AR-10(T) that he had bubba’ed up.
ArmaLite took back his rifle and offered him a brand new one…he still complained for a few months about it.
I’d not place too much stock in what he has to complain about.
So long as he doesn’t contact LMT, he can continue to ride them on this issue. It’s typical agenda-type BS…
He knows they will make it right. He knows that mistakes happen. I didn’t read all 5 pages, but has anyone else chimed in with out-of-spec lugs?
I just recieved my much anticipated order of uppers and BCG’s from LMT last week. Everyone of the bolts are within spec and fit not only into the LMT uppers but several uppers I had lying around. I call the OP’s post on TOS bunk as if he had a problem the 1st thing to do is call LMT and with their steller CS it would have been fixed without having to bitch and whine about it on TOS.
Naturally; but I’m wondering if this incident (if it’s true) is suggesting that LMT may not be HP/MP testing every bolt. I have no idea at all how the HP testing is done, so I’m quite curious.
Interesting. I figured as much, but assumed whatever fixture was used would mimic the dimensions of a new, in-spec barrel extension. However, I guess I can think of ways a fixture would be set up that would accept a bolt with .011 oversize lugs.
If it’s proof tested, the bolt would have to fire a proof load. Wouldn’t the bolt have to lock up in a barrel extension for that to happen? I believe the thought is, if they were proof fired, the bolts wouldn’t lock and would be culled.
I agree, its not a testing issue, its a machining tolerance issue.
The thread on the TOS is a pile of shit. I’d be concerned that there MAY be an issue but the source smells fishy.